Abstract:BACKGROUND: Following the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami event, the global community adopted the UN Hyogo Framework for Action (HFA) for Disaster Risk Reduction 2005-2015, which set out priorities to help countries achieve disaster resilience by encouraging the establishment of national platforms and strengthening disaster governance. In March 2015, UN member states adopted the successor to HFA, the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction: 2015-2030 (SFDRR). The SFDRR recognises the cross-cutting nature of DRR policy and calls on stakeholders to help governments. Over the following months, the international science community as a stakeholder will contribute by outlining guidance, research opportunities and partnerships to help countries implement the new framework. To inform this process, this study examines government' and national scientists' perspectives about the needs to use science, evidence and technology to achieve disaster risk reduction (DRR) and put the words of the new framework into action.METHODS: This study was conducted using qualitative content analysis and quantifiable survey results. Data was collected via extraction from published statements and online survey responses. For statement content analysis, search terms were determined iteratively in a sample of statements until no new terms emerged. Additionally, 167 national scientists were recruited to participate in the online survey with a response rate of 26.3% (44/167).FINDINGS: Country priorities are clustered and clear, showing that there is a demand for greater science in DRR decision-making and solutions. The main themes highlighted by countries were promoting research and practitioner engagement; increase technology transfer mechanisms; open data; communication of usable evidence and user's needs; education and training; and lastly, international cooperation all contributing to national capacity building. As identified, the main difficulties with existing delivery are gaps in knowledge, lack of coordination and a gap in capacity to use scientific evidence for policy-making.CONCLUSIONS: Countries and organisations have identified a range of science and technology related needs, including through the preparatory and drafting process for the Sendai Framework for DRR. Across regions and development levels, countries are seeking to address the gaps they face in scientific capacities and information. It is hoped that understanding these priorities and challenges will help decision-makers and scientists in developing the implementation plan to consider how science, technology and innovation can be enabling factors for DRR. An implementation plan of action underpinned by scientific evidence has the potential to save lives, more accurately target investment, and contribute to greater resilience over the coming decades.

Progress and Challenges Toward Coherence Among Disaster Risk Reduction, Climate Change Adaptation, and Sustainable Development

Promoting Coherence Among Disaster Risk Reduction, Climate Change Adaptation, and Sustainable Development for Disaster Resilience

Moving Forward after Sendai: How Countries Want to Use Science, Evidence and Technology for Disaster Risk Reduction

The Peace Imperative for the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction

Reflections on a Science and Technology Agenda for 21st Century Disaster Risk Reduction

Perspectives of Science and Technology in Disaster Risk Reduction of Asia

Fourteen Actions and Six Proposals for Science and Technology-Based Disaster Risk Reduction in Asia

Evolution of Japan's flood control planning and policy in response to climate change risks and social changes

SDG Final Decade of Action: Resilient Pathways to Build Back Better from High-Impact Low-Probability (HILP) Events

Continuing from the Sendai Framework midterm: Opportunities for urban digital twins in disaster risk management

Improving global coordination of volcanic hazard warnings in support of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction: a four-step plan for aligning with international hydrometeorological arrangements

Investigating the decoupling effects between global sustainable development and multi-disaster crises

Gaps in the governance of floods, droughts, and heatwaves in the United Kingdom

Disaster Risk Science: A Geographical Perspective and a Research Framework

Contribution of the International Consortium on Landslides to the implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction: engraining to the Science and Technology Roadmap

Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Systems: A Systematic Literature Review of Measurement Frameworks

The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction and Disaster Management Plan of Indian Railways

Analyzing Disaster Mitigation Policies in Japan and China from an Eco-DRR Perspective: A Comparative Study of Shanghai and Tokyo

Integration of Eco-DRR and hybrid defense system on mitigation of natural disasters (Tsunami and Coastal Flooding): a review

Disaster and Climate Change Issues in Japan’s Society 5.0—A Discussion

Natural disasters, resilience-building, and risk: achieving sustainable cities and human settlements