Communication Training for Young People with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Evidence-Based Study

E.A. Fomina,I.Y. Suvorova
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/autdd.2024220204
2024-08-01
Autism and Developmental Disorders
Abstract:Objectives. Psycho-educational programs for children and young people with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are aimed to train social and daily skills. The value of emotional exchange often remains outside the focus of teachers. However, the depression and self-harmful behavior experienced by young people with ASD are explained as a lack of social motivation and internal emptiness. The goal of present article is to evaluate the effectiveness of communication training as a safe space for emotional exchange. Methods.  The training is based on the idea of communication as a complex process of interaction, the dynamics of which is influenced by the experience of different type of relationships: mother-child, child-family, child-school, etc. The training involves work through each level of interaction. The trainig effectiveness was evaluated using a formative experiment aimed at assessment of changes in communication of young people with ASD. The experimental sample included 25 people with ASD aged 20 to 25 years (M = 22.7; SD = 1.7), 5 persons in each group. The control sample also included 25 people aged 21 to 25 years (M = 23.3; SD = 1.43). All participants are male. For the primary and control sections, observation units were developed: frequency of violation of social norms, number of completed communicative acts and frequency of social stress. For statistical processing, the Mann-Whitney U test and the Wil coxon W test were used. Results . Using the Wilcoxon W test, the effectiveness of the impact of communicative training on the experimental group was proven: violation of social norms (W = 325; p ≤ 0.01; d = 2.04), completed communicative acts (W = 115; p ≤ 0.01; d = 0.89), social stress (W = 244; p ≤ 0.01; d = 1.04). Using the Mann-Whitney U test, the insignificance of the influence of group dynamics on the training effectiveness indicators in the control group was proven: violation of social norms (U = 615; p ≤ 0.01; d = 3.24), completed communicative acts (U = 184, 5; p ≤ 0.01; d = 0.86), social stress (U = 453.5; p ≤ 0.01; d = 0.93). Conclusions.  Consistent processing of experiences at the level of relationships: mother — child, child — family, child — school, etc. became an effective method for developing communication skills in young people with ASD. In the future, it is necessary to check the duration of the effect after the end of the training, as well as the transfer the acquired skills to other areas of life.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?