Clinical evaluation of sintilimab in conjunction with bevacizumab for advanced colorectal cancer with microsatellite stable-type after failure of first-line therapy

Liang Wang,Yong-Zhi Diao,Xin-Fu Ma,Yu-Shuang Luo,Qi-Jing Guo,Xiao-Qian Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3277
2024-10-27
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Abstract:BACKGROUND At present, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remain the 1st-line therapy method for patients suffering from high microsatellite instability /deficient mismatch repair metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, ICI treatments demonstrate minimal therapeutic efficacy against microsatellite stable (MSS)/proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) CRC. This is mainly because this type of tumor is a “cold tumor” with almost no lymphocyte infiltration. Anti-angiogenic drugs have been found to improve the immune microenvironment by promoting many immune cells to enter the immune microenvironment, thereby exerting anti-tumor effects. AIM To investigate the effects of ICIs combined with bevacizumab monoclonal antibody on tumor immune cells in MSS/pMMR advanced CRC patients with first-line treatment failure. METHODS A total of 110 MSS/pMMR patients with advanced CRC after first-line treatment failure in the Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University were enrolled for a randomized controlled trial. In short, patients in the experimental group (n = 60) were given sintilimab plus bevacizumab for 4 cycles, and those in the control group (n = 50) patients were treated with FOLFIRI combined with bevacizumab for 4 cycles. The expression levels of cluster of differentiation (CD) 8 (+) T cells, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) were comprehensively evaluated to assess the effects of sintilimab combined with bevacizumab on MSS/pMMR advanced CRC sufferers following failure of 1st-line therapy. RESULTS The positive expression rates of CD8 (+) T lymphocytes (30% vs 50%), TAMs (23.30% vs 60%), and CAFs (23.30% vs 50%) before and after treatment in both groups exhibited statistical significance (P < 0.05). Additionally, the therapeutic effects of both groups (partial remission: 26.67% vs 10%; objective response rate: 26.70% vs 10%) were significantly different (P 0.05). CONCLUSION ICIs in combination with bevacizumab can not only improve the patient’s prognosis but also yield safe and controllable adverse drug reactions in patients suffering from MSS/pMMR advanced CRC after failure to a 1st-line therapy.
gastroenterology & hepatology,surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?