The hot breath of the IRS: how trustees can avoid intermediate sanctions

J C Shifman

Abstract:New regulations from the IRS, called "intermediate sanctions," impose stiff taxes and penalties on members of not-for-profit organizations responsible for "unreasonable" compensation. That means administrators, physicians, trustees, and others must be careful to comply with the letter of the law or risk having the IRS breathing heavily down your neck.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Intermediate sanctions: tax traps for the unsuspecting

M Scott

Abstract:In an effort to keep your CEO from leaving, your board is overly generous--with salary, benefits, and perks. But if that generosity goes far beyond the norm for your region and type of organization, you could be letting your CEO and fellow trustees in for some very stiff penalties.
Intermediate tax sanctions: an overview

M W Peregrine

Abstract:New federal tax law applies intermediate tax sanctions when tax-exempt organizations enter into so-called excess benefit transactions with corporate insiders. The sanctions take the form of a two-tiered penalty excise tax, which is assessed not on the tax-exempt organization itself but on the insider who receives the excess benefit and the organizational managers and board members who knowingly participate in an improper transaction. The intermediate tax sanctions, therefore, present tax-planning challenges for tax-exempt hospitals and integrated delivery systems as well as for 501(c)(4) HMOs. Forthcoming treasury regulations are expected to add clarity to the new law.
On the Standard for Unspecific Objects in Illegal Fund-Raising:A New Explanation from the Perspective of Private Placement

Li Youxing,Fan Junhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.2011.06.211

2011-01-01

Abstract:Whether or not the fund-raising objects are specific will affect the nature of the fund raising in private sector.One of the necessary components for illegal fund-raising is raising funds from unspecific objects.Although there are rules on illegal fund-raising,the rules are so vague and simple and have many defects such as the vague standard for friend-relative,the improper characterization of spreading from mouth to mouth and so on.In the case of Wu Yin,these problems became the foci of the controversy,and furthermore,one cannot reach the correct conclusion by merely relying on criminal law.To perfect the standard for unspecific objects,the institution of ″safe-harbor″ in the U.S.securities law is of significant reference value.In order to achieve this goal,we should amend the criminal law,clarify the standards,change the legal regulatory architecture and transform the government's philosophy in regulation.
Independent contractor arrangements and IRS audits

S Pelfrey,B A Theisen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005110-199507000-00018

Abstract:As government auditors begin their challenges, nurse executives need to review their operations to remove any potential audit risks. Although a common practice for many institutions, the use of independent contractor arrangements may be ruled inappropriate. As a result, many individuals may be reclassified as employees, leading to Internal Revenue Service (IRS) assessments of penalties and back payroll taxes. It always is prudent to anticipate IRS actions and shore up any areas that may lead to tax assessments before they are imposed on the institution.
Finder's fees. Legitimate activity or ethical quagmire?

A B Sanborn 2nd,K V Hanley

Abstract:In the last decade, healthcare organizations have adopted business methods that have proved effective in other industries. In Catholic, community-based healthcare, however, some of these borrowed mechanisms, such as the "brokering" of facilities for a fee, seem inappropriate. Any corporate officer who benefits financially by brokering the sale of his or her corporation to another may be creating a problem in any of the following legal areas: fiduciary responsibilities and the "business judgment rule," conflict of interest, the corporate opportunity doctrine, private benefit or private inurement. If, in anticipation of a circumstance or transaction, a senior corporate executive or officer dedicates time, energy, and corporate resources to the development of her or his personal benefit without first providing for the corporate interests, she or he probably raises the issue of the corporate opportunity doctrine. The Internal Revenue Code of 1986 provides that an organization which qualifies as a public charity is one in which "no part of the net earnings . . . inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual." The Internal Revenue Service has made it clear that a finding of prohibited inurement or private benefit will place an organization's tax-exempt status at risk.
IRS scrutiny and corporate innovation

Nathan Goldman,Niklas Lampenius,Suresh Radhakrishnan,Arthur Stenzel,Jose Elias Feres de Almeida

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12905

IF: 3.6

2023-09-15

Contemporary Accounting Research

Abstract:The IRS administers tax laws enacted by Congress. As part of the IRS's duties, they often consider taxpayers' financial statements to help ensure accurate tax reporting and payments. We posit that enhanced financial statement disclosures of tax information under FASB Interpretation Number 48 (FIN 48) lead to more IRS scrutiny and altered the incentives for corporate innovation. Using patent applications as a measure of corporate innovation, we employ a difference‐in‐differences research design with publicly listed US firms as the treatment group and privately held US firms not subject to the disclosure requirements as the control group. We find robust evidence that following the onset of FIN 48, the number of patent applications by publicly listed firms decreased between 15.4% and 24.3% relative to private firms. This decline in patent applications is attributable to incremental innovation, suggesting that firms lower innovation related to projects with tax benefits that are more likely to be scrutinized by the taxing authorities. These findings suggest that there are real effects of IRS scrutiny and, in particular, real effects of tax disclosures under FIN 48 on corporate innovation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

business, finance
Tax Administration in China: is It Rule Without Law?

Jingyi Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2019.1576293

IF: 0.542

2018-01-01

Asia Pacific Law Review

Abstract:Previous research examined Chinese tax administration based on the perception of the lack of the rule of law, and the situation of a low rate of tax litigation in China is interpreted as a result of non-rule-based administration. This article, by looking at large enterprises' tax administration in China, establishes that the relatively harmonious relationship between taxpayers and tax authorities is a result of the implementation of preventive tax policies, in particular, a combination of incentives, punishment and respectful treatment of taxpayers. The Chinese government also adopts new legal measures and constraints to improve the legitimacy and fairness of tax administrative work. This article reflects the progress made in China in pursuit of the target of 'governing the country in accordance with law' (i.e. the rule by law) and indicates the potential in further developing the rule of law with Chinese hallmarks.
How to avoid deferred-compensation troubles

Todd I Freeman

Abstract:Executive compensation packages have long included stock options and deferred compensation plans in order to compete for talent. Last year, Congress passed a law in response to the Enron debacle, in which executives were perceived to be protecting their deferred compensation at the expense of employees, creditors, and investors. The new law is designed to protect companies and their shareholders from being raided by the very executives that guided the company to financial ruin. Physicians who are part owners of medical practices need to know about the changes in the law regarding deferred compensation and how to avoid costly tax penalties. This article discusses how the changes affect medical practices as well as steps physician-owned clinics can take to avoid the risk of penalty, such as freezing deferred compensation and creating a new deferred compensation plan.
Aggressive Tax Planning and Tax Risk Management

A. Joseph

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59403/1g3999c

2016-02-18

Abstract:Tax risk management is increasingly occupying the interest of not only the tax authorities but also tax managers in companies. With increased scrutiny in the wake of recent high-profile tax cases, the issue will gain prominence. This article discusses some of the matters relevant to tax risk management.
FIN 48: headaches for hedge fund tax compliance function

Roger D. Lorence

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/15285810810908680

2008-09-12

Journal of Investment Compliance

Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explain some tax management complications for onshore and offshore hedge funds posed by US FIN 48, Uncertain Tax Positions, and to emphasize the hedge fund manager's responsibility for careful tax planning and compliance. Design/methodology/approach The paper discusses a hedge fund's objective to deliver tax‐efficient results to investors, explains the background of FIN 48, and illustrates five types of situations in which conservative auditors following FIN 48 may raise “red flags.” Findings With the advent of FIN 48's standards careful tax planning and compliance are more important than ever for a hedge fund. Significant complications may arise from unwise, tardy, or missed tax elections; filing an IRS Form 8275, Disclosure Statement, stating that a fund is using a method of accounting contrary to IRS regulations; or having a business construed for US tax purposes as a finance company operating in the USA. Hedge fund managers need to know the rules concerning interest expense exceeding interest income and expenses paid by investors in a fund of funds. Originality/value The paper provides practical guidance from an experienced securities and hedge fund lawyer.
Examining the Efficacy of Accountability Systems in Preventing Nonprofit Misconduct: A Look Beyond Financial Fraud

Meeyoung Lamothe,Ani Ter-Mkrtchyan,Travis B. Ruddle,Kayleigh Kuyon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640211073750

2022-02-17

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

Abstract:The purpose of our study is to broaden the investigation of nonprofit misconduct beyond financial fraud perpetrated by individual actors and to identify structural features that are more or less likely to be associated with actual misconduct. We utilize the Charity Navigator Advisory System and related press releases to identify 215 nonprofit organizations with confirmed or alleged misconduct. We also collect the IRS Form 990 information for 133 out of the 215 organizations with known misconduct and 150 organizations without known misconduct to compare their accountability structures. Our findings suggest that, while financial fraud committed by individual perpetrators against their organizations is the most frequently identified type of misconduct, a substantial number of other types of misbehaviors also commonly occur. Our comparison analysis indicates that organizations with known misconduct deviate significantly from scandal-free charities in several structural aspects.

social issues
Fiduciary duties of interlocking directors within a nonprofit health system

Nathan Hershey,Christine M Jarzab

Abstract:In response to regulatory and financial pressures, entities participating in the healthcare industry have joined with others in order to maintain, even improve, their market positions. In the non-profit sector of the industry, partnerships, mergers, and acquisitions have included arrangements whereby some corporate partners have interlocking directors. After review of the fiduciary duties of care and loyalty owed by corporate board members, and their application to traditional performance and conflict of interest situations, the authors address two scenarios raising interlocking director issues.
Not-for-Profit community hospitals' exempt status at issue in charity care controversy

James J Unland

Abstract:Revocations of local property tax exemptions, class action lawsuits, and state and Congressional investigations all beset the not-for-profit sector of the hospital industry. These problems originated from issues relating to the pricing of services to the uninsured, the relative availability of "charity care" or lack thereof and the collection tactics that some hospital-contracted collectors use. Is this controversy really just symptomatic of the extent to which health care charging and payment systems are out of whack? Are ambiguous government regulations to blame? Is large-scale payment reform the real answer?
Employee/independent contractor determinations

D A Hastings

Abstract:Among the areas receiving increased scrutiny recently from the Internal Revenue Service is employee/independent contractor determinations. The IRS estimates an annual $1.5 billion loss of revenues because of misclassification of workers as independent contractors rather than employees. Organizations found to be in violation of the FICA withhold payment requirements could be subject to significant penalties and assessments.
Corporate governance, incentives, and tax avoidance

Christopher S. Armstrong,Jennifer L. Blouin,Alan D. Jagolinzer,David F. Larcker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.02.003

IF: 7.293

2015-08-01

Journal of Accounting and Economics

Abstract:We examine the link between corporate governance, managerial incentives, and corporate tax avoidance. Similar to other investment opportunities that involve risky expected cash flows, unresolved agency problems may lead managers to engage in more or less corporate tax avoidance than shareholders would otherwise prefer. Consistent with the mixed results reported in prior studies, we find no relation between various corporate governance mechanisms and tax avoidance at the conditional mean and median of the tax avoidance distribution. However, using quantile regression, we find a positive relation between board independence and financial sophistication for low levels of tax avoidance, but a negative relation for high levels of tax avoidance. These results indicate that these governance attributes have a stronger relation with more extreme levels of tax avoidance, which are more likely to be symptomatic of over- and under-investment by managers.

business, finance,economics
Recent hospital charity care controversies highlight ambiguities and outdated features of government regulations

Charles MacKelvie,Michael Apolskis,James J Unland

Abstract:For years the hospital industry has been embroiled in controversies involving pricing, charity care, and collection practices. Unfortunately, Medicare regulations and policies governing hospital charge-setting and collection practices have not helped bring much clarity to the situation, nor has related CMS and OIG guidance. Coordinated effort by hospitals and regulatory bodies can help clarify unclear government regulation of charity care, pricing, and collections and end potentially destructive controversies that sap valuable time, energy, and resources from efforts addressing much graver long-term threats to hospital viability.
Beyond the Bottom Line: Assessing Charity Care, Community Benefits, and Tax Exemptions in Nonprofit Hospitals

Hossein Zare,Gerard Anderson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/jhm-d-24-00080

2024-11-20

Journal of Healthcare Management

Abstract:The wide range of charity care and community benefits spending and the value of tax exemptions ( Herring et al., 2018 ; Johnson et al., 2019 ; Lamboy-Ruiz et al., 2019 ) have raised many arguments about the lack of specificity on community benefits definitions and requirements established by federal, state, and local governments, as well as professional organizations ( James, 2016 ).

health policy & services
Analyzing the Impact of IRS Actions on Tax Compliance from Individuals to Corporate Entities

Mega Kurnia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.60079/atr.v2i1.236

2024-01-31

Abstract:The study investigates the multifaceted dynamics of tax compliance behavior across individual and corporate entities, aiming to elucidate the impact of IRS actions on compliance outcomes. Employing a multi-perspective approach, integrating insights from psychology, sociology, economics, and law, the research examines the intricate interplay of individual, organizational, and institutional factors shaping taxpayer behavior. Methodologically, the study draws on a comprehensive analysis of existing literature and empirical evidence, synthesizing findings from various disciplinary perspectives. Key findings underscore the significant influence of enforcement measures, such as audits and penalties, in deterring non-compliance and promoting voluntary adherence to tax laws. Moreover, the research highlights the role of psychological motivations, organizational norms, and societal perceptions in shaping compliance decisions. The implications of the study extend to policymakers and tax authorities, emphasizing the importance of adopting a balanced and nuanced approach to enforcement strategies. By addressing the challenges outlined in the discussion, policymakers can develop evidence-based interventions that enhance compliance culture, strengthen enforcement efforts, and foster public trust in the tax system. The study underscores the need for future research to explore the complex interactions between taxpayer education, enforcement actions, and compliance behavior, as well as the sustainability of compliance outcomes over time.
Administrative procedures as tax enforcement tools

Wei Cui,Jeffrey Hicks,Michael Wiebe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111649

IF: 1.469

2024-03-21

Economics Letters

Abstract:We study how common administrative procedures affect firm tax evasion. We begin with the counter-intuitive observation that many firms bunch above, rather than below, large notches in China's corporate income tax. Cross-sectional patterns suggest that administrative procedures in the prepayment and refund system served as de facto enforcement tools that prevented some firms from accessing the reduced tax rates below the notches. Following a regulatory reform that eliminated these procedures, bunching below the notches increased dramatically. The results imply a trade-off between reducing administrative barriers and allowing much taxpayer non-compliance in low-compliance environments.

economics
Does giving tax debtors a break improve compliance and income? Evidence from quasi‐random assignment of IRS Revenue Officers

William C. Boning,Joel Slemrod,Ellen Stuart,Alex Turk

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.13268

2024-12-07

Economic Inquiry

Abstract:This paper uses the quasi‐random assignment of IRS Revenue Officers to tax debtors' cases as an instrumental variable to identify the causal effects of suspending debt collection on tax compliance and future income. In contrast to uninstrumented estimates, we find no statistically significant evidence that putting off attempts to collect debt reduces compliance with future tax obligations or future reported income. Among marginal hardship cases, pausing collection instead increases future income, specifically wage earnings by the taxpayer's spouse. In addition, we address concerns about potential non‐random assignment of Revenue Officers.

economics

The hot breath of the IRS: how trustees can avoid intermediate sanctions

Intermediate sanctions: tax traps for the unsuspecting

Intermediate tax sanctions: an overview

On the Standard for Unspecific Objects in Illegal Fund-Raising:A New Explanation from the Perspective of Private Placement

Independent contractor arrangements and IRS audits

Finder's fees. Legitimate activity or ethical quagmire?

IRS scrutiny and corporate innovation

Tax Administration in China: is It Rule Without Law?

How to avoid deferred-compensation troubles

Aggressive Tax Planning and Tax Risk Management

FIN 48: headaches for hedge fund tax compliance function

Examining the Efficacy of Accountability Systems in Preventing Nonprofit Misconduct: A Look Beyond Financial Fraud

Fiduciary duties of interlocking directors within a nonprofit health system

Not-for-Profit community hospitals' exempt status at issue in charity care controversy

Employee/independent contractor determinations

Corporate governance, incentives, and tax avoidance

Recent hospital charity care controversies highlight ambiguities and outdated features of government regulations

Beyond the Bottom Line: Assessing Charity Care, Community Benefits, and Tax Exemptions in Nonprofit Hospitals

Analyzing the Impact of IRS Actions on Tax Compliance from Individuals to Corporate Entities

Administrative procedures as tax enforcement tools

Does giving tax debtors a break improve compliance and income? Evidence from quasi‐random assignment of IRS Revenue Officers