Abstract:Purpose: The primary objective of the present research is to identify the basic tools and restrictions concerning the protection of privacy and personal data in the EU and China as two fundamentally different cultural systems. Based on the socio-cultural analysis of backgrounds, trends and expert assessments, the research aims to examine whether privacy protection standards, such as those provided by the GDPR in the EU, are sufficiently robust to endure the digital age. Two different cultural frameworks have been analysed in order to understand their influence on practical behaviours regarding the democratic safeguards in privacy rights enforcement in the EU compared with China. This is accomplished by comparing social control in the EU and the social credit system in China. Design/Methodology/Approach: Considering the administrative context, a combined qualitative approach is applied, including normative and dogmatic methods, literature analysis, sociological and historical methods, expert interviews, and comparative and axiological methods. Findings: The results of both theoretical and empirical parts of the research suggest that the stricter regulation in the EU compared to China – in the sense of more consistent protection of privacy and personal data as well as transparency rights – can be attributed to its democratic protection of human rights and more definitive regulations, particularly the GDPR. These major differences seem to create an even deeper gap in the future, to be explored scientifically and in practice. The authors conclude that authorities must actively guarantee the rights related to privacy and personal data protection, or else effective governance will lead to a surveillance society and erosion of individuals’ freedom as a valuable civilizational asset. Academic contribution to the field: The research contributes to administrative science by addressing one of the key concepts of modern public governance, namely the collision between the principles of effectiveness and transparency on the one hand and privacy on the other. The use of scientific methods paves the way for further comparisons. Practical Implications: The article provides a concise overview of the relevant literature and an analysis of the rules that underpin the implementation, evaluation and improvement of regulations, especially in the light of ICT development, e.g. in times of the Covid-19 pandemic. Originality/Value: The paper bridges the gap created by the differences in the understanding of privacy and public governance in the field in the EU and China based on cultural differences. The usual general or merely law- or technology-based analyses are upgraded with a combination of various research methods.

Exploring Novel Frontiers in Online Privacy Ethics

Foreign experience of personal data protection in social networks

An Exploratory Qualitative Study on People’s Attitudes towards Offline and Online Social Networks: A Case Study at a Brazilian University

Social Network Analysis, Ethics and LGPD, considerations in research

Privacy concerns in social media UGC communities: Understanding user behavior sentiments in complex networks

Some Problems in Data Ethics and Social Media Ethics

The Power and Pitfalls of Transparent Privacy Policies in Social Networking Service Platforms

Online Social Media Communication: the Effect of Having Privacy Violation Experience on Online Behavior

Conceptualizing Online Social Networking Privacy Concerns

Public attitudes towards social media field experiments

Media convergence and publicness: Towards a modular and iterative approach to online research ethics

Incidental Data: Observation of Privacy Compromising Data on Social Media Platforms

The Challenges and Impact of Privacy Policy Comprehension

User self-disclosure on social network sites: A cross-cultural study on Facebook’s privacy concepts

Smile, YOU'RE Being Watched: Digital Privacy and Risk Perception Regarding Data Sharing on Social Networks

The protection of the right to privacy as the social imperative of digital age: How vulnerable are we?

Social Aspects of Democratic Safeguards in Privacy Rights: A Qualitative Study of the European Union and China

Beyond the Individual Privacy Paradigm: Implications for Interpersonal Interactions on Facebook

Protecting human health and security in digital Europe: how to deal with the "privacy paradox"?

A Cross-Cultural Perspective on the Privacy Calculus

Social network data analysis to highlight privacy threats in sharing data