The Many Colors of the AURORA: Trial Design Issues Worth Noting

Jose F Camargo,Yoichiro Natori
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae113
IF: 20.999
2024-04-05
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Abstract:To the Editor —We read with interest the recent publication of the multicenter phase 3 AURORA trial (NCT02927067) comparing maribavir to valganciclovir as preemptive therapy for cytomegalovirus (CMV) following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) [1]. Although the primary endpoint of noninferiority of maribavir for CMV clearance at week 8 was not met (maribavir, 70%; valganciclovir, 77%), the authors emphasized the comparable rates of CMV viremia clearance during post-treatment follow-up, with fewer discontinuations due to neutropenia in the maribavir arm. Maribavir was initially studied for the prevention of CMV, but the phase 3 trial in HCT failed to show efficacy, possibly related to underdosing [2]. Subsequently, maribavir was studied for the treatment of post-transplant resistant or refractory CMV infection [3, 4], leading to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for this indication in November 2021. Now, results from the phase 3 AURORA trial [1], added to phase 2 data [5], strongly suggest that maribavir can also be used as preemptive therapy for CMV in HCT recipients. This is important given the limited number of FDA-approved antivirals available for treatment of CMV, most of which are only available for intravenous use. Yet, there are important issues of the AURORA trial design worth noting.
immunology,infectious diseases,microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?