Abstract:This paper examines ‘open’ AI in the context of recent attention to open and open source AI systems. We find that the terms ‘open’ and ‘open source’ are used in confusing and diverse ways, often constituting more aspiration or marketing than technical descriptor, and frequently blending concepts from both open source software and open science. This complicates an already complex landscape, in which there is currently no agreed on definition of ‘open’ in the context of AI, and as such the term is being applied to widely divergent offerings with little reference to a stable descriptor. So, what exactly is ‘open’ about ‘open’ AI, and what does ‘open’ AI enable? To better answer these questions we begin this paper by looking at the various resources required to create and deploy AI systems, alongside the components that comprise these systems. We do this with an eye to which of these can, or cannot, be made open to scrutiny, reuse, and extension. What does ‘open’ mean in practice, and what are its limits in the context of AI? We find that while a handful of maximally open AI systems exist, which offer intentional and extensive transparency, reusability, and extensibility– the resources needed to build AI from scratch, and to deploy large AI systems at scale, remain ‘closed’—available only to those with significant (almost always corporate) resources. From here, we zoom out and examine the history of open source, its cleave from free software in the mid 1990s, and the contested processes by which open source has been incorporated into, and instrumented by, large tech corporations. As a current day example of the overbroad and ill-defined use of the term by tech companies, we look at ‘open’ in the context of OpenAI the company. We trace its moves from a humanity-focused nonprofit to a for-profit partnered with Microsoft, and its shifting position on ‘open’ AI. Finally, we examine the current discourse around ‘open’ AI–looking at how the term and the (mis)understandings about what ‘open’ enables are being deployed to shape the public’s and policymakers’ understanding about AI, its capabilities, and the power of the AI industry. In particular, we examine the arguments being made for and against ‘open’ and open source AI, who’s making them, and how they are being deployed in the debate over AI regulation. Taken together, we find that ‘open’ AI can, in its more maximal instantiations, provide transparency, reusability, and extensibility that can enable third parties to deploy and build on top of powerful off-the-shelf AI models. These maximalist forms of ‘open’ AI can also allow some forms of auditing and oversight. But even the most open of ‘open’ AI systems do not, on their own, ensure democratic access to or meaningful competition in AI, nor does openness alone solve the problem of oversight and scrutiny. While we recognize that there is a vibrant community of earnest contributors building and contributing to ‘open’ AI efforts in the name of expanding access and insight, we also find that marketing around openness and investment in (somewhat) open AI systems is being leveraged by powerful companies to bolster their positions in the face of growing interest in AI regulation. And that some companies have moved to embrace ‘open’ AI as a mechanism to entrench dominance, using the rhetoric of ‘open’ AI to expand market power while investing in ‘open’ AI efforts in ways that allow them to set standards of development while benefiting from the free labor of open source contributors.

Analyze and Evaluate the Method Used as Well as the Fallout of OpenAI's Board of Directors Decision to Remove Sam Altman as CEO of the Company

What the OpenAI drama means for AI progress — and safety

Open (For Business): Big Tech, Concentrated Power, and the Political Economy of Open AI

Appraising Regulatory Framework Towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) under Digital Humanism

Governance of the AI, by the AI, and for the AI

Strategic Implications of Openness in AI Development

A Critical Historic Overview of Artificial Intelligence: Issues, Challenges, Opportunities and Threats

Analyzing Potential Solutions Involving Regulation to Escape Some of AI's Ethical Concerns

Why 'open' AI systems are actually closed, and why this matters

Open AI in Education, the Responsible and Ethical Use of ChatGPT Towards Lifelong Learning

GPT-3 and InstructGPT: technological dystopianism, utopianism, and “Contextual” perspectives in AI ethics and industry

A Safe Harbor for AI Evaluation and Red Teaming

Artificial Intelligence: First Do the Long Overdue Doable

Shaping AI's Impact on Billions of Lives

Debates on the nature of artificial general intelligence

Open Data and transparency in artificial intelligence and machine learning: A new era of research

The Stuff We Swim in: Regulation Alone Will Not Lead to Justifiable Trust in AI

Ethical Artificial Intelligence - An Open Question

OpenAI is beating Google in the AI race, but who wants the future they are building?

Evaluation of OpenAI o1: Opportunities and Challenges of AGI

Artificial Intelligence and Public Health: An Exploratory Study