Abstract:[Abstract] With the sample of Chinese initial public offering (IPO) companies in 2001 and 2002, this paper investigates the relationship between stock ownership concentration and firm performance. We find a significant cubic relation between firm performance and stock ownership concentration (percentage of shareholdings by the largest or square sum of percentage of shareholdings by the first five bigger shareholders); that is, changing with increase of stock ownership concentrating, the firm performance presents a trend of decrease-increase-decrease. [Keywords] Stock ownership structure; stock ownership concentration; firm performance Literature Interview Starting with Berle and Means's first study on the relationship between stock ownership distribution and firm performance, relationships between ownership structure and firm performance have become an academic focus. Over the past thirty years, foreign scholars have studied relationships between ownership and firm performance and developed two views. One is that stock ownership and firm performance have a positive relationship. From Iensen and Mechkling (1976), the managers' proportion of share holding has a positive relationship with firm performance. McConnel & Servaes (1990), Laessens et al. (2002), and Lins (2003) found equity ownership concentration and firm value have a positive relationship. Second is that ownership structure and firm performance have a nonlinear relationship. Morck, Shleifer and Vishny (1988) investigated Tobin Q when managers' shareholdings were located at 0-5 percent, 5-25 percent and 25-100 percent, and found that when managers' shareholdings increased, firm performance would increase first but then decrease. McConnel & Servaes (1990) found that shareholdings of management and Tobin Q has an inverse U-shape quadratic function relation. Based on Morck, Shleifer, and Vishny (1988)[5] , Cho (1998) constructed a section linear function model, and found when located at 0-7 percent, 7-38 percent and 38-100 percent, firm performance and the percentage of internal stockholders shareholdings were positive, negative, and positive relative, that is Nshaped relative. Based on comparing the corporate governance between British companies and American companies, Short and Keasey (1999) creatively constructed a cubic relative function model of manager shareholding and firm performance, and found the two had an obvious cubic functions relationship: when the percentage of manager shareholdings is below 15.58 percent or above 41.84 percent, firm performance would increase with the increase of the percentage of manager shareholdings; when the percentage of manager shareholdings were located at 15.58~41.84 percent, firm performance would decrease with the increase of the percentage of manager shareholdings. However, from Demsetz and Lehn (1985) and Demsetz and Villaonga (2001), stock ownership structure had no relationship with firm performance. In China, limited by policy, the scale of manager shareholdings of public companies is very small. Stock ownership concentration is presented as a degree of shareholdings of or several big stockholders. For a long time, the phenomenon of one stockholder, biggest shareholder has existed in China's public companies. The company is controlled by the largest shareholder. In fact, the plays the role of internal stockholder. Chinese scholars have conducted many studies on ownership concentration and firm performance and formed two views: One is that ownership concentration has a positive relation with firm performance. Chen and Xu (2001) found that in a non-protective industry, the percentage of biggest shareholdings had a positive relationship with firm performance; Li and Zhao (2004) found that the percentage of the biggest shareholdings had a positive relation with the net return of assets. Xu, Qin Yu, and Chen (2006) also found that there was a positive relationship between ownership concentration and firm performance, and this kind of relationship existed between shareholders with different natures. …

Equity Concentration and Inefficient Investment

Equity Concentration and Investment Efficiency

Do Private Equity Investors Conspire with Ultimate Owners in the IPO Process?

Bank Financing and Corporate Governance

Ownership structure, financing constraints and inefficient investment: empirical analyses of Chinese data

When Does Equity Sharing of Core Employees Incentive Innovation for Small and Medium Enterprises?

A Literature Review of the Impact of Equity Concentration on Corporate Financial Performance

Do Executive Equity Incentives Improve the Efficiency of Corporate Investment? ‐‐ An Empirical Analysis from Chinese Listed Companies

Internal control quality, equity pledge financing and investment efficiency

Study on the Largest Shareholder's Effect on Choice of Capital Structure

Investment efficiency, ESG performance and corporate performance: evidence from Chinese listed enterprises

How mixed ownership affects investment efficiency? evidence from state-owned enterprises in China

Do Largest Shareholders Incentively Affect Financial Sustainability Under Holdings Heterogeneity? Regulation/Intermediary of Financial Constraints Through Managerial Behavior Games

Fixed Asset Investment and Enterprise Performance Based on the Moderating Effects of the Nature of Equity

Stock Ownership Concentration and Firm Performance-An Empirical Study Based on IPO Companies in China

Equity pledge of controlling shareholders, property right structure and enterprise innovation efficiency: evidence from Chinese firms

Equity Incentive,Controlling Shareholder and Cost of Equity Capital

Management equity incentives and corporate tax avoidance: Moderating role of the internal control

Equity ownership concentration’s impact on corporate internal control: the moderating effects of female directors and board compensation

Will executive equity incentives affect investor relations management: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies

Absence of ultimate controller and investment efficiency: Evidence from China