Abstract:Usually, cost analysis in carbon capture and storage is based on the calculation of CAPEX and energy requirements, which are the main variable affecting OPEX, in order to obtain a value that is expressed in € per ton of CO2 avoided. This value can be then compared with EU carbon prices to have a first impression of the project feasibility. However, this analysis only involves one output that is CO2 and all costs are allocated to this “commodity”. When dealing with carbon capture and utilization, processes can include more outputs. For example, when CO2 is combined with H2 in power-to-fuels applications, several products (and heat) could be produced. The cost analysis then becomes more complex. Moreover, if different inputs are added (as in these applications), several types of analysis could be done to allocate costs and study the feasibility of the system.This paper analyses the case of power-to-methane (PtM) using carbon capture technology for CO2 recycling. PtM is a technology that stores excess energy in form of synthetic CH4 through the methanation of hydrogen produced by electrolysis. As methanation requires a source of CO2, it is provided from the flue gas of a boiler or CO2 captured with amine scrubbing. The synthetic methane produced is used in a boiler under a circular process with intermittent renewable energy (to the electrolyser) as input and constant heat released by the boiler as output. In this scheme, electrolyser has two inputs (power and water) and two outputs (H2 and O2). Boiler has one inputs (CH4) and three outputs (CO2, H2O and heat). Methanation reactor has two main inputs (CO2 and H2) and three outputs (CH4, H2O and heat).The problem to solve is not new. Many times in industrial processes, the overall costs are required to be assigned to individual products, either because of internal accounting and tax reporting, because of contracts with public administration, rates and prices regulation or any other possible commercial litigation situation. For a detailed cost analysis like this, the first step is identifying the products and defining the type of product in each case. Usually, we can consider three different types of products: the main product (if the production process yields one product with much higher total sales value than the others), joint products (when there are two or more products with much higher sales value than the rest) and the by-products, which are the marketable products that have clearly lower sales value.Thus, in this study three different power-to-gas configurations have been simulated (electrolyser, methanation and CH4 boiling) and a Material Flow Cost Accounting analysis has been implemented on each one of them. In addition, four different allocation methods have been proposed, depending on the considered as target products. Differences show that including O2 as a by-product can decrease a 33% the production cost of 1MWh of thermal energy if the suitable cost allocation method is selected.

Multiscale analysis for the utilization of CO 2 towards the production of chemicals at the country level: Case study of Spain

A near-zero carbon emission methanol production through CO2 hydrogenation integrated with renewable hydrogen: Process analysis, modification and evaluation

A techno-economic and life cycle assessment for the production of green methanol from CO2: catalyst and process bottlenecks

Techno-Economical Assessment for Combined Production of Hydrogen, Heat, and Power from Residual Lignocellulosic Agricultural Biomass in Huesca Province (Spain)

Techno-Economic Assessment of the Integration of Direct Air Capture and the Production of Solar Fuels

Shaping the future of methanol production through carbon dioxide utilisation strategies

Financial Evaluation of Alternatives for Industrial Methanol Production Using Renewable Energy with Heat Pump Technology

Levelized Cost of Biohydrogen from Steam Reforming of Biomethane with Carbon Capture and Storage (Golden Hydrogen)—Application to Spain

Integrated CO 2 capture and conversion into methanol units: Assessing techno-economic and environmental aspects compared to CO 2 into SNG alternative

Techno-Economics Optimization of H2 and CO2 Compression for Renewable Energy Storage and Power-to-Gas Applications

Conceptual Process Design and Technoeconomic Analysis of an e-Methanol Plant with Direct Air-Captured CO 2 and Electrolytic H 2

Bio-methane and bio-methanol co-production from biogas: A profitability analysis to explore new sustainable chemical processes

Cost Allocation in Ccu. Application to Power to Gas with H2 and Co2 Utilization

Optimizing hydrogen and e-methanol production through Power-to-X integration in biogas plants

Integrated e-Methanol and Drop-in Fuels Hydrothermal Liquefaction Platform-Techno-Economic and GHG Emissions Assessment for Grid-Connected Plants under Flexible BECCU(S) Operation

Methanol Production from Residual Streams of Natural Gas Sweetening for Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals

CO2-to-methanol: Economic and environmental comparison of emerging and established technologies with dry reforming and methane pyrolysis

Feed Flexibility of CH4 Combined Reforming for Methanol Production

Alternative sustainable routes to methanol production: Techno-economic and environmental assessment

Combination of CO 2 electrochemical reduction and biomass gasification for producing methanol: A techno-economic assessment

Comparative investigation of CO2-to-methanol process using different CO2 capture technologies