Abstract:AbstractThe present research used behavioral and event-related brain potentials (ERP) measures to determine whether emotional capture is automatic in the emotion-induced blindness (EIB) paradigm. The first experiment varied the priority of performing two concurrent tasks: identifying a negative or neutral picture appearing in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream of pictures and multiple object tracking (MOT). Results showed that increased attention to the MOT task resulted in decreased accuracy for identifying both negative and neutral target pictures accompanied by decreases in the amplitude of the P3b component. In contrast, the early posterior negativity (EPN) component elicited by negative pictures was unaffected by variations in attention. Similarly, there was a decrement in MOT performance for dual-task vs. single task conditions but no effect of picture type (negative vs. neutral) on MOT accuracy which isn't consistent with automatic emotional capture of attention. However, the MOT task might simply be insensitive to brief interruptions of attention. The second experiment used a more sensitive reaction time (RT) measure to examine this possibility. Results showed that RT to discriminate a gap appearing in a tracked object was delayed by the simultaneous appearance of to-be-ignored distractor pictures even though MOT performance was once again unaffected by the distractor. Importantly, the RT delay was the same for both negative and neutral distractors suggesting that capture was driven by physical salience rather than emotional salience of the distractors. Despite this lack of emotional capture, the EPN component, which is thought to reflect emotional capture, was still present. We suggest that the EPN doesn't reflect capture but rather downstream effects of attention, including object recognition. These results show that capture by emotional pictures in EIB can be suppressed when attention is engaged in another difficult task. The results have important implications for understanding capture effects in EIB.

Emotional capture of spatial attention is suppressed in high anxiety but at a non-spatial time cost

Emotional capture during emotion-induced blindness is not automatic

Emotion and anxiety interact to bias spatial attention.

Rapid attentional biases to threat-associated visual features: The roles of anxiety and visual working memory access.

Trait Anxiety Influences Negative Affect-modulated Distribution of Visuospatial Attention

Trait-Anxious People Take Longer to Search for Happy Faces in the Presence of Neutral and Fearful Distractors

Searching for emotional salience

Neural evidence for attentional capture by salient distractors

Anxiety, emotional distraction, and attentional control in the Stroop task.

Dissociating Spatial Attention and Awareness in Emotion-Induced Blindness

Moderate threat causes longer lasting disruption to processing in anxious individuals

Does high state anxiety exacerbate distractor interference?

Emotional Distractors Capture Attention even at Very Low Contrast Levels: ERP evidence

Tracking the Misallocation and Reallocation of Spatial Attention toward Auditory Stimuli

Exogenous Attention to Emotional Stimuli Presenting Realistic (3D) Looming Motion

Reward-modulated attention deployment is driven by suppression, not attentional capture

Attentional suppression of dynamic versus static salient distractors

Temporal-spatial neural activation patterns linked to perceptual encoding of emotional salience

Attentional Control in Subclinical Anxiety and Depression: Depression Symptoms Are Associated With Deficits in Target Facilitation, Not Distractor Inhibition

Modulatory effects of goal relevance on emotional attention reveal that fear has a distinct value

Threat of shock increases distractor susceptibility during the short-term maintenance of visual information.