Abstract:Introduction Psychopathological exploration (PPE) involves an assessment of the mental state of patients, where psychological signs and symptoms are analyzed, which collectively form a syndrome. To conduct this assessment, the clinician must utilize their expertise to identify the presence and authenticity of a series of symptoms that, once recognized, allow for a diagnosis (1). The presence of this subjective component could explain why, despite the continuous growth of artificial intelligence (AI), its application in clinical psychiatry practice remains limited. However, the combination of the clinician's work with AI could enhance diagnostic accuracy and our understanding of diseases (2). Objectives The objective of this study is to investigate whether AI can make accurate diagnoses through an initial psychopathological evaluation. Methods A random sample was selected from our medical records of all patients admitted to our acute mental health inpatient unit through the hospital's emergency services in the year 2022. An anonymized database was created, including sociodemographic information, the results of the psychopathological assessment in the emergency department, and the diagnosis at the time of discharge. The psychopathological assessment conducted in the emergency department was provided to the AI chatbot ChatGPT, with a request to establish a diagnosis according to the DSM-5. Diagnoses such as brief psychotic disorder, schizophreniform disorder, and schizophrenia were considered, given their acute symptom similarities, as well as major depressive disorder (unipolar) and bipolar disorder. The level of agreement between both diagnoses was evaluated using the kappa coefficient. Results The sample consisted of 15 patients, of whom 60% were male, with a mean age of 45 years (standard deviation = 15.6). 73.3% of the patients had prior mental health follow-up, and 66.7% had been previously hospitalized. Diagnoses included psychotic disorder in 33.3% of cases, bipolar disorder with manic episode in 26.7%, depressive disorder in 13.3%, delusional disorder in 13.3%, schizoaffective disorder in 6.7%, and borderline personality disorder in 6.7%. A kappa value of 0.561 was obtained, indicating a moderate degree of agreement between the diagnoses. Conclusions Despite the inherent subjectivity in psychopathological assessment, this study suggests that AI, in the form of natural language processing chatbots like ChatGPT, can be a useful tool to assist mental health professionals in the diagnostic process. While AI shows promising potential, it should not entirely replace the experience and clinical judgment of mental health professionals. Instead, the importance of potential collaboration between AI and clinicians for achieving more precise and comprehensive diagnoses is highlighted. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Role of ChatGPT and Google Bard in the Diagnosis of Psychiatric Disorders: A Comparative Study

Assessment of the Capability of Artificial Intelligence for Psychiatric Diagnosis

A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Google’s AI’s “Bard” in Medicine

S2150 Language AI Bots as Pioneers in Diagnosis? A Retrospective Analysis on Real-time Patients at a Tertiary Care Center

Evaluating ChatGPT-4's Accuracy in Identifying Final Diagnoses Within Differential Diagnoses Compared With Those of Physicians: Experimental Study for Diagnostic Cases

ChatGPT is not ready yet for use in providing mental health assessment and interventions

ChatGPT in medicine: A cross-disciplinary systematic review of ChatGPT's (artificial intelligence) role in research, clinical practice, education, and patient interaction

To Compare the Efficiency of ChatGPT and Bard in Medical Education: An Analysis of MCQ-Based Learning and Assessment

Diagnostic accuracy of large language models in psychiatry

Appraising the performance of ChatGPT in psychiatry using 100 clinical case vignettes

Embracing the future—is artificial intelligence already better? A comparative study of artificial intelligence performance in diagnostic accuracy and decision‐making

Diagnostic Accuracy of ChatGPT for Patients' Triage; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Practical Use of ChatGPT in Psychiatry for Treatment Plan and Psychoeducation

Are Different Versions of ChatGPT's Ability Comparable to the Clinical Diagnosis Presented in Case Reports? A Descriptive Study

ChatGPT and autoimmunity - A new weapon in the battlefield of knowledge

ChatGPT Assisting Diagnosis of Neuro-ophthalmology Diseases Based on Case Reports

Innovating dental diagnostics: ChatGPT's accuracy on diagnostic challenges

ChatGPT in Iranian medical licensing examination: evaluating the diagnostic accuracy and decision-making capabilities of an AI-based model

Accuracy of Online Artificial Intelligence Models in Primary Care Settings

Utilizing Artificial Intelligence Application for Diagnosis of Oral Lesions and Assisting Young Oral Histopathologist in Deriving Diagnosis from Provided Features - A Pilot study

Exploring the role of ChatGPT in clinical decision-making in otorhinolaryngology: a ChatGPT designed study