Abstract:Background Dysphagia affects over half of adults after stroke. Dysphagia rehabilitation aims to improve swallowing and reduce negative outcomes for these adults. However, significant variability exists in dysphagia rehabilitation. Research is needed to explore the underlying clinician‐specific and workplace factors that contribute to variability in dysphagia rehabilitation after stroke. Aim To explore factors influencing speech pathology practice in dysphagia rehabilitation after stroke. Methods & Procedures We used a phenomenological approach with an interpretivist perspective. Twenty speech pathologists working in dysphagia rehabilitation participated from different workplace settings around Australia. Five semi‐structured focus groups were conducted online. Data were inductively analysed using thematic analysis with a coding reliability method. Outcomes & Results Four themes were discussed within focus groups: (1) relationship between experienced and less experienced clinicians: 'Following what other people have done', (2) need for collaborative learning: 'A safe space to share and train', (3) variation between settings impacts on continuity of care: 'There's a difference between community and acute', and (4) working effectively with multidisciplinary teams (MDT): 'An MDT which can listen to the voice of speech pathology'. Conclusions & Implications Relationships between senior and junior speech pathologists, within speech pathology and MDT, and across inpatient and community settings influenced speech pathology practice. Flattened hierarchies in speech pathology, collaborative learning in workplaces, mutual respect within teams and connection across inpatient and community settings could improve the quality and consistency of dysphagia rehabilitation after stroke. What this paper adds What is already known on this subject Dysphagia rehabilitation can improve swallowing after a stroke. However, dysphagia rehabilitation is characterised by variability in clinical practice. Clinician‐specific and workplace factors influence clinical practice and may contribute to variability in dysphagia rehabilitation. What this study adds Professional relationships influence speech pathologists' clinical practice, including relationships between senior and junior clinicians, between inpatient and community settings and with peers and multidisciplinary teams. Workplace norms and hierarchies, poor continuity of care between settings and competing priorities from other disciplines can hinder dysphagia rehabilitation. However, collaborative learning, positive workplace cultures and respectful transdisciplinary care can improve the quality and consistency of clinical practice. What are the clinical implications of this work? Flattening hierarchies in the workplace can foster a safe learning space. Further, questioning workplace norms and seeking out peer learning within and across settings can build clinical skills and confidence. Developing positive workplace cultures that support continuous development may be key for empowering speech pathologists to provide high‐quality and consistent dysphagia rehabilitation.

Dentistry and Speech Therapy : From Multidisciplinary to Interdisciplinary Collaboration

Principles of interdisciplinary orthodontic and restorative treatment

Collaboration of Surgeons and Speech Pathologists in the Selection of Optimal Treatment; Role of Speech Pathologist and Audiologist in the Interdisciplinary Management of Patients With Clefts

Teamworking in Dentistry: The Importance for Dentists, Dental Hygienists and Dental Therapists to Work Effectively Together—A Narrative Review

Achieving excellence with interdisciplinary approaches in complex orthodontic adult patients

Interrelationship between dental clinicians and laboratory technicians: a qualitative study

The Synergy of Periodontic and Orthodontic Collaboration in Contemporary Oral Health Practice

What comes first: teeth or face? Recommendations for an interdisciplinary collaboration between facial esthetic surgery and dentistry

A strife of interests: A qualitative study on the challenges facing oral health workforce policy and planning

The Influence of Orthodontic Treatment on Periodontal Health between Challenge and Synergy: A Narrative Review

Feasibility of interprofessional partnerships between neurologists and dentists for oral health management of Parkinson's disease

Toward a Comprehensive Model of Medical-Dental-Behavioral Integration

Exploring facilitators and barriers associated with oral care for inpatients with dysphagia post-stroke

Dentistry, nursing, and medicine: a comparison of core competencies

An investigation of the training of eight-year stomatological students in interdisciplinary cases treatment

Multidisciplinary approaches in complex oral rehabilitation: integrating surgery, endodontics, orthodontics, and implants for functional and aesthetic restoration: a narrative review

Challenges and Opportunities in Preparing Dentists for Primary Care

Factors influencing speech pathology practice in dysphagia after stroke: A qualitative focus group study

It Is Time for a Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Approach: A Scoping Review on Stomatognathic Diseases in Neurological Disorders

Collaboration between general dental practitioners and dental hygienists: a qualitative study

Bridging the gap — Establishing a dental-oncology service in a cancer centre