WAR TRAUMA, HISTORY AND NARRATIVE: ANALYSIS OF SELECTED AFGHAN FICTION IN ENGLISH
Inayat Ullah
Abstract:This study uses trauma literary theory to analyze selected Afghan fiction in English. Following trauma theories by Cathy Caruth and Dominic LaCapra, according to whom literature serves as a site for a belated enactment and witnessing of what can be referred to as an unclaimed moment of trauma, the study analyzes novels by Afghan writers, Atiq Rahimi and Khaled Hosseini, to see how the trauma-hit characters narrate the ravages of war in Afghanistan, and if these flashbacks and hauntings of the past are in accordance with the tenets of trauma theory. As Caruth uses the image of the wound that cries out and addresses us in an attempt to tell us of a reality or truth that is not otherwise available, to indicate that trauma can only be understood through literary or symbolic language, this study investigates Rahimi’s Earth and Ashes (2002) and Hosseini’s The Kite Runner (2003) to show that the Afghan fiction in English works against a collective amnesia by representing traumatic experiences and their impact on individuals and communities in the war-ravaged Afghanistan, thus dealing with, and bringing forth, the traumatic history that many people believe to be a matter of a long forgotten past. The study analyzes the protagonists’ experience of trauma, as portrayed by the novelists, its effects and the process of working through. This endeavor is in place as unlike the Holocaust, the 9/11, the Vietnam War and other traumatic episodes of certain bigger and technologically as well as publishing-wise advanced nations, hardly any work has been done by researchers on trauma fiction by Afghan writers in English. To start with, this qualitative study outlines the major trauma-related works of Caruth, LaCapra, Felman, Tal, and Whitehead, and then, keeping in view the tenets of trauma theory, it goes on to trace the accounts of the characters in the selected novels to study their reaction to the trauma of war in the light of coping with trauma mechanisms by Erikson (1994) as well as LaCapra’s (2001) theory of Working Through to see how their flashbacks present the records of history. As the psychological impact of war may seem too minuscule or ordinary to be recorded under the spectrum of the official account, called history, the study also analyzes the development of the trauma-hit characters in the light of Hermin’s (1992) coping with trauma mechanism, which details all the stages of a trauma survivor’s journey from the moment when s/he is hit by trauma to the establishment of safety around him/her, mourning the loss(es), remembrance of the incident of trauma, and return to normal life. The study concludes that trauma fiction, unlike historical accounts, deals with a particular traumatic experience from a more personalized, integrated, and complete scope, bringing forth what is recorded, and what is kept safe in an undiluted form, in the mind of the survivor in order to add first hand witnessed details to history.
History