Abstract:<p>In this paper, we empirically explore the effect of the complexity of a security's design on hypotheses relating to credit rating shopping and rating catering in the collateralized loan obligation (CLO) market in the period before and after the global financial crisis in 2007. We find that complexity of a CLO's design is an important factor in explaining the likelihood that market participants display behaviors consistent with either rating shopping or rating catering. In the period prior to 2007, we observe for more complex CLOs a higher incidence of dual-rated tranches, which are more likely to have been catered by credit rating agencies to match each other. Conversely, in the period after 2007, for CLOs, it is more likely that issuers shopped for ratings, in particular opting for a single credit rating by Moody's, not by S&P. Furthermore, contrary to what market participants might expect, investors do not value dual ratings more than single ratings in the determination of the offering yield at issuance. Looking at the explanatory power of credit ratings for a dual rated CLO, the degree to which investors increase their reliance on credit ratings depends to a large extent on the disclosure of an S&P rating, not Moody's. This suggests that investors recognize credit rating risk by agency in pricing CLOs. In sum, the policy implication is that, to effectively regulate CLOs, the regulatory environment ought to differentiate between complex and non-complex CLOs.</p>

A bottom-up, reduced form credit risk model approach for the determination of collateralised loan obligation capital

Evaluating the Default Risk of Bond Portfolios with Extreme Value Theory

A Top-down Model for Cash CLO

Collateral-Enhanced Default Risk

Security Design and Credit Rating Risk in the CLO Market

A Simplified Approach to modeling the credit-risk of CMO

CDO Rating Models in the Crisis

The measure of model risk in credit capital requirements

A comparative analysis of current credit risk models

Borrower Level Models for Stress Testing Corporate Probability of Default and the Quantification of Model Risk

Can Structural Models Price Default Risk? New Evidence from Bond and Credit Derivative Markets

Pricing Credit Default Swap Subject to Counterparty Risk and Collateralization

Connecting the Top-Down to the Bottom-Up: Pricing CDO under a Conditional Survival (CS) Model

A New Model for Pricing Collateralized Financial Derivatives

Can Structural Models Price Default Risk? Evidence from Bond and Credit Derivative Markets

Risk-based capital requirements for mortgage loans

A Rating-Based Sovereign Credit Risk Model: Theory and Evidence

Bottom-Up Default Analysis of Corporate Solvency Risk: An Application to Latin America

A Tree Model for Pricing Credit Default Swaps with Equity, Market and Default Risk

Simulating Credit Loss Distributions: Empirical Versus the Vasicek Model

Model Risk in Credit Risk