A Study on the Legislative Regulation of Online Disinformation

Joonhwa Jung,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.58555/li.2023.3.1

2023-06-30

Abstract:The proliferation of online services has facilitated the widespread dissemination of false information, commonly known as fake news. Efforts to combat this issue include fact-checking, but the substantial costs and efforts involved hinder its broad implementation. While governments attempt direct regulation and penalties for false information, their effectiveness is limited in addressing the rapidly evolving landscape of misinformation. The Media Arbitration Commission, until now, has primarily focused on news-type content from established media entities, which is a narrow scope. However, there are ongoing discussions about extending its jurisdiction to cover entities beyond traditional media. The Korea Communications Standards Commission plays a role in regulating illegal online content. However, categorizing false manipulated information as illegal could potentially infringe on individual freedom of expression. Domestically, companies respond to false manipulation information within the framework of the Information and Communication Network Act. On the global stage, companies like Meta and YouTube internally regulate and remove such content. The legislative models of Germany's Network Enforcement Act and France's Information Manipulation Struggle Act provide valuable insights into addressing false manipulated information. Given the unique nature of false manipulation information, it's worth exploring legislative alternatives that establish a central response portal, curtail the impact of misinformation, promote fact-checking, and enhance user media literacy. Both domestic and foreign legislative experiences can contribute to creating effective strategies.