THE IMAGE OF RUS’ TROIKA IN RUSSIAN LITERATURE OF THE SECOND HALF OF THE 19TH CENTURY

A.B. KRINITSYN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55959/msu0130-0075-9-2024-47-02-8
2024-06-16
Abstract:The article examines the philosophical and cultural meaning of the symbol of Russian troika in the Dead Souls of N.V. Gogol as the Russian logos. The phenomenon of the ‘vast’ Russian space turns out to be metaphysically mysterious and axiologically ambivalent. In Gogol’s metaphysics, death is thought of as stillness, immobility (“They don’t move. Death strikes the unmoving world”), and life is like movement. Vast expanses open up an endless possibility of movement, moreover, they generate it. Therefore, the road ‘saves’ [Gogol 1951: 222], and fast riding on a troika, rooted in Russian nature, becomes a symbol of the life of the soul, resurrection and renewal. The article examines several works where the troika is understood as the archetype of Russia. This is the poem Fields by A.N. Maikov, where a frenzied ride on a troika symbolizes the aspiration of the Russian people to enter a new unexplored future after the abolition of serfdom. On the contrary, in N.A. Dobrolyubov’s poem In the Prussian Carriage, behind the ironic opposition of the Russian ‘living’ troika to the ‘dead machine’ of the West, one reads the criticism of Gogol’s historiosophical concept of inexhaustible ‘liveliness’ of Russia, embodied in the free movement of the troika. Although Dostoevsky is outraged by a caricature of the image of Russia-troika presented by the prosecutor in The Brothers Karamazov, he agrees that the structure depicted is true to life. Metaphysically, the phenomenon of ‘karamazovschina’ understood as Russian nature with its width, passionate desire to transgress all boundaries in everything, is based on Gogol’s symbol, whereas Russian love of fast ride, also noted by Gogol, in Dostoevsky’s novel turns out to be a desire for violent flight and come-downs of his characters. The article aims to show how consistent Dostoevsky was in his reproduction of the Russian metaphysics in Gogol’s sense, giving it a fatal, catastrophic character, yet retaining its positive sense and salvatory intention.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?