Abstract:Abstract Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is conventionally managed with topical minoxidil, while platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and oral minoxidil present alternative options. Head-to-head trials are scarce, necessitating a comparative study. This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the efficacy of low-dose oral minoxidil (2.5 mg once daily), topical minoxidil (5% twice daily), and PRP (four sessions, conducted every 4 weeks) combined with topical minoxidil 5% twice daily in individuals with AGA. Natural regulatory T cells (Tregs; CD4+ CD25high FOXP3+) reside within hair follicles, fostering the proliferation of hair follicular stem cells (HFSCs) through the NOTCH signalling pathway by elevating Jagged1 ligand expression. Additionally, the study explored the impact of these treatments on Treg cell populations – inducible Treg cells (CD4+ CD25low FOXP3+) and natural Treg cells (CD4+ CD25high FOXP3+) – and signalling molecules including cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA)4, NOTCH and Jagged1. In total 66 male participants were randomly assigned to three groups of 22 patients each: oral minoxidil (Group 1), topical minoxidil (Group 2) and PRP with topical minoxidil (Group 3). Clinical and videodermoscopic assessments were conducted every 8 weeks, over 32 weeks. Treg cell populations and signalling molecules were analysed in skin biopsies (n = 5 from each group) obtained at baseline and 32 weeks. At 32 weeks, six (27%) patients each in Group 1 and Group 3, and three (14%) patients in Group 2 showed improvement in the grade of AGA. At 32 weeks, Group 3 significantly surpassed Groups 1 and 2 in increasing terminal hair density (P = 0.03 and P = 0.02, respectively). Group 1 had notably decreased vellus hairs compared with Group 3 (P = 0.02), and no significant difference was seen between Groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.2). Reduction in hair diameter diversity was observed with all three modalities, with earlier responses in Groups 1 and 3 (P < 0.01). A proportionate significant increase in natural Treg cells and a decrease in inducible Treg cells was observed at week 32 compared with baseline, without significant modality-specific differences: Group 1, mean 36.2 (SD 15); Group 2, mean 22 (SD 3.4); Group 3, mean 33.7 (SD 10); P = 0.31. A mean decrease in CTLA4 level and an increase in NOTCH and Jagged1 levels with a weakly negative nonsignificant correlation was observed in all three groups at week 32, with no modality-specific differences. Combining PRP with topical minoxidil achieved superior terminal hair density, while oral minoxidil exhibited an advantage in reducing vellus hair density. The study endorses low-dose oral minoxidil as an alternative to topical use and indicates the benefits of combining oral or topical minoxidil with PRP.

A Comparative Study on the Efficacy and Safety of 10% Topical Minoxidil versus 5% Topical Minoxidil in the Treatment of Male Pattern Hair Loss

Comparison of a New 5% Minoxidil Foam and Rogaine? in the Treatment of Androgenetic Alopecia in Chinese Men: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III, Equivalence Trial

Comparison of a New 5% Minoxidil Foam and Rogaine® in the Treatment of Androgenetic Alopecia in Chinese Men: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III, Equivalence Trial

Clinical efficacy and safety of low‐dose oral minoxidil versus topical solution in the improvement of androgenetic alopecia: A randomized controlled trial

Efficacy of Topical Finasteride 0.25% With Minoxidil 5% Versus Topical Minoxidil 5% Alone in Treatment of Male Pattern Androgenic Alopecia.

Efficacy and safety of a new 5% minoxidil formulation in male androgenetic alopecia: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, noninferiority study

Safety and efficacy of 2% topical minoxidil in the management of male pattern baldness in Chinese

Placebo‐controlled dose‐effect studies with topical minoxidil 2% or 5% in male‐patterned hair loss treated with oral finasteride employing an analytical and exhaustive study protocol

A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial of a novel formulation of 5% minoxidil topical foam versus placebo in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia in men

Comparison of Efficacy of Topical Betamethasone Dipropionate and Topical Minoxidil in Patients With Alopecia Areata

Comparison of Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma With and Without Topical Minoxidil for Hair Growth in Patients With Androgenetic Alopecia: A Prospective Study

The Role of 5% Minoxidil <em>versus</em> Platelet-Rich Plasma in Treatment of Alopecia Areata

Efficacy and Safety of 5% Minoxidil Alone, Minoxidil Plus Oral Spironolactone, and Minoxidil Plus Microneedling on Female Pattern Hair Loss: A Prospective, Single-Center, Parallel-Group, Evaluator Blinded, Randomized Trial

A clinical study on the efficacy of minoxidil liniment in treating female pattern hair loss

Comparative Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Topical 5% Cetosomal Minoxidil and Topical 5% Alcohol-Based Minoxidil Solutions for the Treatment of Androgenetic Alopecia in Indian Men

A Pilot Split-Scalp Study Of Combined Fractional Radiofrequency Microneedling And 5% Topical Minoxidil In Treating Male Pattern Hair Loss

BH06 (P110) Comparative efficacy of low-dose oral minoxidil, topical minoxidil, and platelet-rich plasma with topical minoxidil in androgenetic alopecia: a randomized controlled trial

Platelet-rich plasma microneedling versus 5% topical minoxidil in the treatment of patterned hair loss

P110 Comparative efficacy of low-dose oral minoxidil, topical minoxidil, and platelet-rich plasma with topical minoxidil in androgenetic alopecia: a randomized controlled trial

Review of oral minoxidil as treatment of hair disorders: in search of the perfect dose

Comparative Study to Evaluate Tolerability of Topical 5% Minoxidil Novel Formulation and Alcohol-Based Conventional Solutions in Treatment of Androgenetic Alopecia in Indian Men: Randomized Double-Blind Study