Abstract:Introduction. In 1930th – the 1950th years in the USSR the centralized planned command economic model was realized, where the main resources were aimed at the development of means of production. The production of consumer goods, as well as the wages of the population, were extremely limited, so the emission was the main source of development. After the death of I. V. Stalin, his successors changed the model. They refused to maintain the balance of the economy and money circulation and redistributed part of the state’s income in favor of the population, by significantly increasing cash payments. Results of this model are investigated in the article. Materials and Methods. The study bases on the departmental documents of the State Bank of the USSR. They contain not only departmental statistical data, but also expert assessments, which in the article are compared with the results of modern researchers. Results. The growth of money incomes of the population led to an increase in the cash supply, which took place at an outstripping pace. The deficit of the economy could not be overcome. In the same years, producers’ cooperatives which partially satisfying the needs of the population were nationalized. Their employees have become unregistered private entrepreneurs, who produced goods and services in the shadow economy. A significant part of the population who produced and consumed these goods ensured the flow of money from the official economy to the shadow one. Another part of the excess money was deposited in savings accounts. Ignoring the shadow sector parasitizing the deficit problem, the Soviet leadership did not stop attempts to solve it. A significant part of the USSR’s oil and gas revenues was spent on consumer goods. The result of the implemented economic policy was the inflationary bubble and the growth of the shadow economy. Discussions. The transition to a new economic model can be explained by the fatigue of the ruling class from the stress of previous decades, as well as the populism of Stalin’s successors. Through the production of the consumer goods, the official economy was tightly connected with the shadow one, which began to grow rapidly at the expense of budget funds, subjugating state trade, generating deficits, and corrupting the government machinery. The government lost the fight against the shadow economy, and in fact, ignored its presence. At the end of 1980th the Soviet economy collapsed. Conclusion. The transition to a new economic model led to the long-term destabilization of money circulation and to the concentration of money, which was not provided with goods and services. The failure of the government to stabilize money circulation and solve the problem of commodity deficit has caused an increase in unmet demand, as well as the growth of the shadow economy. The inability of the government to break the link with the parasitic shadow economy and stop the growth of the cash supply predetermined the economic collapse of the USSR.

Review of the Book by V.M.Zubok “Collapse. The Fall of the Soviet Union”.

“A Mold Foreign to Leninism Fetters the Forces of the Party”: A Veteran of the Ruling Party S. S. Starostin on the Problems of the USSR of Mid-1980s in a Letter Addressed to M. S. Gorbachev

"The scenario of confederation is unlikely": the consequences of the August 1991 crisis in the USSR in secret CIA reviews (on the 30th anniversary of the collapse of the Soviet Union)

The Historical Contribution of the October Revolution to the Economic and Social Development of the Soviet Union—Analysis of the Soviet Economic Model and the Causes of Its Dramatic End

On re-examining western attitudes to Russia

THE REGIONAL STRATIFICATION OF POLITICAL SPACE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE USSR’S COLLAPSE. CONCEPTUAL PARADOXES AND CONCEPTUAL DECISIONS

RUSSIA BETWEEN THE WEST AND THE EAST: A STUDY OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BY SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS

The Soviet Union as a composite state structure: education, development trends and causes of disintegration

Telling and retelling a historical event: the collapse of the Soviet Union in Finnish parliamentary talk

The Soviet Union and China in the 1980s: reconciliation and divorce

Economic Policy in the Soviet Union during the Years of Perestroika

PROBLEMS OF WESTERNIZATION OF THE CONTEMPORARY RUSSIAN POLITICAL CULTURE

Economic Model of the Post-Stalinist USSR and its Results

Rethinking and Reviving: the Modern Fate of Traditional Russian Values

Scientifically and practically significant development of a major and relevant economic and managerial topic (about the book by Yu.B. Vinslav «Management of integrated structures: theoretical and methodical aspects»)

REVIEW OF THE COLLECTIVE MONOGRAPH «DISSERTATION CULTURE OF THE RUSSIAN HISTORICAL AND SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY: EXPERIENCE AND PRACTICE IN THE PREPARATION AND DEFENSE OF DISSERTATIONS (19th – EARLY 20th CENTURY)» (MOSCOW – SAINT PETERSBURG, 2022)

The "Soviet Factor" in 1989 Political Upheaval of Eastern Europe

The Philosophy of the “Late” Era of the UkrSSR: Specificity of Criticism of Bourgeois Theories (a Case Study of the Books by Larysa Levchuk)

Soviet Union in the 1970s – 1980s in the mirror of foreign documentary heritage

Conceptual failure of post-Soviet integration

Shift in Government Policy Regarding Computer Technology Development in USSR in Late 1960s