Effect of Tax Policy Changes on Corporate Investment Decisions in Saudi Arabia

Hussain Khan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47672/ajacc.2166
2024-07-02
Abstract:Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the effect of tax policy changes on corporate investment decisions in Saudi Arabia. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: The study indicated that reductions in corporate tax rates generally lead to increased investment by companies. Lower taxes can free up funds that businesses then use for capital expenditures, research and development, and expansion projects. Conversely, higher tax rates may discourage investment, as they reduce after-tax profits and make certain projects less economically viable. However, the relationship between tax policy and investment decisions is complex and can vary depending on factors such as the overall economic environment, industry dynamics, and the specific details of the tax changes. Overall, though, there is evidence to suggest that tax policy plays a substantial role in shaping corporate investment behavior. Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Pecking order theory, agency theory and neoclassical investment theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the effect of tax policy changes on corporate investment decisions in Saudi Arabia. Policymakers and corporate leaders should collaborate to design tax policies that align with strategic investment objectives, fostering economic growth, innovation, and market competitiveness. The findings from research studies on the effect of tax policy changes on corporate investment decisions can inform evidence-based policymaking aimed at optimizing tax frameworks for economic resilience and dynamism.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?