Abstract:Introduction. The problem of incomplete coincidence of views of K. Marx and F. Engels has long been raised in marxology. On this topic, D. McLellan, M. Ryubel, K.N. Lubutin and P.N. Kondrashov spoke. However, they were limited to political economy and ontology. We will discuss the views of classics on the origin of private property and the state. Methodology and sources. In this article the textual analysis of the works «Origin of family, private property and state» by F. Engels and «Forms preceding capitalist production» and «Manuscripts of 1844» by K. Marx is taken. The author a dopts a historical-comparative approach, combining the ideas of the classics with those of later Marxist schools. Results and discussion. F. Engels explains the appearance of the state by class contradictions. However, it does not distinguish the concept of «class» from the concept of «estate» and ignores the fact that in the pre-capitalist era an individual opposed another individual as a representative of a community that provided a certain standard of living. In a paragraph entitled «Forms Preceding Capitalist Production» in the «Economic Manuscripts of 1857–1861», K. Marx describes how the state emerged as an organizer of forced community works. This coercion was determined not by socio-political factors but by natural factors. Labor created not only a social product, but also the very relationship of domination. We show the semantic connection of this concept with that which was embodied K. Marx in «Economical-philosophical manuscripts of 1844». Conclusion. In classical Marxism there is no unified concept of the origin of the state and private property; the concepts of K. Marx and F. Engels differ from each other in the interpretation of the role of labor in this process. F. Engels attributes a passive role to labor. For K. Marx, the role of labor is active: labor itself creates its opposite, private property, and with it the state, which arises and exists due to the limitations of labor.

Private property, labour and the transformation of Political Economy in 1844 Manuscripts

On Karl Marx's Early Economic Study from the Perspective of Doctrinal History

Marx's Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts in 1844 and Its Inspiration for Human Beings

Is Marx's Theory of Alienated Labor in Paris Manuscript Circular Reasoning

History and Political Economy in Karl Marx’s Mathematical Manuscripts

"On Capital" and the Microscopic Foundation of Historical Materialism:Taking Marx's Productivity Theory as Example

The Change of the View of Private Property: The Theoretical Opportunity of Marx's Transcendence of Philosophical Communism

F. Engels and K. Marx on the Origin of Private Property and the State: One Concept or Two?

Reconstructing Marx's Critique of Political Economy from His London Notebooks

On Philosophical Content of Karl Marx's Concept of “Material Production”

The Historical Guidepost of Marx's Economic Thought:Reading Marx's Economic Manuscripts of 1861-1863

The Philosophical Method of Marx's Economic Assumptions as Exemplified in the Relationship between Two Definitions of "Socially Necessary Labor Time"

An interpretation of division of labor in textual context- The theme of The Manuscripts of Economic Philosophy 1844, Ideology of Deutschland and On Capital

Labor View of Marx’s “Paris Period” and Its Implications to Modernity Governance of Dual Logic by the Labor Concept in Paris Manuscripts

Productivity Examined under Historical Materialism

On the Three-dimensional Ideology of Young Marx's Ethical Theory on Labour ──from Paris Manuscripts to Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts in 1844

The Thesis of Marx's Over-rall Critique——on Economic and Philosophical Manuscipts,1844

The Turning Point of Marx’s Thoughts:the Theory of the Alienation of Commerce in Glossen zu James Mill

A New Analysis of the Logical Line of Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844

Historical Materialism and the Writing Process of Das Kapital

On the Ecoethic Implication of Marx's Economics and Philosophy Manuscript in 1844