Abstract:Introduction. The article is devoted to contemporary digital diplomacy, which is implemented within the framework of social networks. Unlike traditional diplomacy digital one operates in a different communicative space where blogs, electronic media and global social networks are the key communication channels. Using these tools allows digital diplomacy actors to influence events and communities in other countries. Methods and materials. Method of mixing qualitative and quantitative data, hashtag-analysis, comparative analysis of the social networks’ messages and accounts were able to understand the dynamics and interactions in social networks, engagement and possibilities of institutional and private actors in digital diplomacy. Analysis. In the 2000s foreign policy and public diplomacy began forming based on data on the mood of users of social networks and their preferences in politics. Thanks to this, digital diplomacy may well become one of the innovative tools for resolving modern global problems. Digital diplomacy, as a new method and the tool for implementing foreign policy, contributes to the effective functioning of departments and ministries of foreign affairs, their response to the needs of citizens, to emerging challenges and threats to state security, like a global epidemic or natural disasters. Using digital tools, it is possible to shape the norms of communication, interaction and decision-making by which diplomats perform their work, modifying the diplomatic process. Besides this digital diplomacy increases the attractiveness of the state in the eyes of the world community. Results. Based on a comparative analysis study of the content of social networks, it could be concluded that over almost a decade, from the 2010s to the 2020s, digital diplomacy has developed from a “soft power” mechanism to a method of information warfare and propaganda which involves artificial intelligence tools and big data. But this is predominantly characteristic of technologically developed countries. It is possible to conclude about future co-existence of traditional and digital diplomacies in a new hybrid variety. Authors’ contribution. In this article Liudmila M. Reshetnikova has contributed Introduction, Research Methods, Analysis and Results sections: identified risks and threats to digital diplomacy, analyzed the development of the soft power methods, identified features and tools of digital diplomacy. Irina M. Samokhina has contributed Analysis and Results sections: analyzed social networks and digital infrastructure for digital diplomacy and diplomatic activity, contemporary computer tools for learning about social networks.

FEATURES OF THE RUSSIAN “SOFT POWER” AT THE PRESENT STAGE OF DEVELOPMENT

Digitalization As a Growth Factor of ˋˋSoft Power'' in the Context of Globalization

Russia’s Public Diplomacy: From Soft Power to Strategic Communication

Understanding Russia's Soft Power Strategy

The Role of Social Media in Implementing the Concept of “Soft Power”

Education as a Resource for the Formation of “Soft Power” in Working with Young Compatriots Living in the CIS countries

The implementation of “smart power” of China and Russia by the means of education and culture in foreign policy

“Soft Power” Digital Capabilities in the Tourist Image Construction of a Big City (on the Example of St. Petersburg)

Russia's Soft Power Discourse: Identity, Status and the Attraction of Power

Diaspora diplomacy as a component of Russia’s “soft power” policy, practice of Moscow

Conservative soft power: liberal soft power bias and the ‘hidden’ attraction of Russia

The Multidimensional Soft Power of Illiberal States: Russia in the Western Balkans

The Concept of «Power» in International Relations

Mongolia’s Soft Power Tools in Relation to Russian Regions at the Beginning of the 21st Century.

The role of the Confucius Institutes in the dissemination of the Chinese language in the Russian Federation

Public diplomacy of the people's republic of China in the context of post-Afghan events

K-POP AS A MAIN TOOL OF KOREAN ‘SOFT POWER’ TOWARDS CENTRAL ASIA

Digital Diplomacy and Social Media Networks: Contemporary Practices of Innovation in Foreign Policy

Information confrontation between Russia and the USA: differences in the principles of public diplomacy, results of activities and prospects

Russian Foreign Policy and Public Diplomacy: Meeting 21st Century Challenges

DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF MODERN PRACTICES OF STRATEGIES TO JUSTIFY THE TECHNOLOGICAL SOVEREIGNTY OF RUSSIA