Understanding the Influence of Chatbot Human-Likeness on User Satisfaction in Erroneous Customer-Chatbot Interactions

Claudia Franke,Andrea Gröppel-Klein,Natalie Matla
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15358/0344-1369-2024-2-20
2024-01-01
Marketing ZFP
Abstract:Increasingly, businesses rely on AI-driven tools like chatbots to facilitate customer communication. However, chatbot services might not always run flawlessly, yet there remains a gap in comprehensive research regarding consumer responses to such errors. In an experimental between-subjects design (N = 232), we manipulated the type of chatbot (robot-like vs. human-like) and the absence vs. presence of an error to investigate the interplay between visual chatbot human-likeness and error occurrence on user satisfaction and subsequent attitudinal and intentional variables. We discover that highly human-like chatbots increase satisfaction in error-free situations, but in error-prone scenarios, less-human-like designed chatbots might be the better choice. We further investigated the ascription of responsibility as a potential explanatory construct. From a managerial perspective, we advise that chatbots should incorporate human cues, while managing user expectations and acknowledging limitations. Future studies should consider different errors, contexts, and explanatory variables to deepen the understanding in this area of research.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?