Post-exercise ketone supplementation improves endurance performance, but not cardiac function during an 8-week training intervention

Y Bekhuis,R Robberechts,T Rosseel,K Taha,P Hespel,C Poffe,G Claessen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwae175.286
IF: 8.526
2024-06-01
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Abstract:Abstract Background/Introduction Post-exercise ketone supplementation (PEKS) is commonly used in endurance athletes to alleviate overtraining symptoms and to stimulate recovery. The introduction of PEKS can blunt the development of symptoms associated with overtraining, suggesting a potential improvement in exercise recovery and exercise-induced cardiac adaptations. Although acute nutritional ketosis temporarily improves cardiac function at rest in healthy individuals and heart failure patients, the effects of PEKS on cardiac function during exercise and its relation to endurance performance remain to be tested. Purpose The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of PEKS on (a) endurance performance, (b) cardiac adaptations, and (c) safety, during a well-balanced 8-week training intervention to prevent overtraining. Methods Recreationally active young men (n=28) were enrolled in a double-blind, pair-matched, placebo-controlled, supervised 8-week endurance training program (Figure 1). The intervention group (n=14) received 25 grams of oral ketone ester (KE) immediately after each training session and 30 min before sleeping time, while the controls (n=14) ingested an isocaloric control drink (CON). Before (PRE) and after (POST) the training intervention, maximal oxygen uptake, endurance performance, and cardiac function during exercise were evaluated using a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), a 30-minute time trial (TT30min), and a CPET combined with echocardiography (CPETecho), respectively. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain during exercise was used as a measure of contractile reserve. Results Mean power output during TT30min at POST (299±28W vs. 291±27W, p=0.0004) (Figure 2A), as well as during upright CPET (473±41W vs. 457±43W, p=0.029) was significantly higher between KE and CON. Peak oxygen consumption (KE: +208±320 mL vs. CON: +327±398 mL, p>0.05) and peak exercise cardiac output (KE: +0.82±3.28 L/min vs. CON: +1.67±1.97 L/min, p>0.05) during CPETecho increased after the training intervention, but no significant difference was observed between KE and CON (Figure 2B-C). Global longitudinal strain during exercise was similar in PEKS compared to controls. Conclusions This study is the first to demonstrate that PEK improves endurance performance in recreationally active men but does not impact cardiac function during exercise. This indicates that the positive effect of PEKS on exercise performance is not mediated by cardiac adaptations. Further research is required to elucidate the mechanisms through which PEKS improves endurance performance.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?