Innovation-driven Development, Innovation Paradigm and the Rise of Innovation Science
Chen Jin,Li Genyi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19345/j.cxkj.1671-0037.2022.12.001
2022-01-01
Abstract:The research on innovation theory has gone through more than a hundred years since 1912. With the efforts of numerous researchers, it has gradually formed an interdisciplinary,and systematic knowledge, which provides significant theoretical support for the economic and social development of countries all over the world, becoming an important theoretical school of social science. Because of the increasingly fierce global competition, emerging international conflicts, and geopolitical issues, the implementation of innovation-driven development strategy under the new development paradigm develops a more systematic innovation system and constantly improves this system, so as to form the innovation science（IS）.On the basis of summarizing the existing literature reviews of innovation theory, this paper conducts innovative research on IS based on Kuhn’s philosophy of science,which put forward the framework of "scientific community-paradigm-science".Firstly, Based on the former’s outstanding researches, this paper analyzes the relationship among these scholars’ researches, sorts out the scientific schools and draws the research context diagram to reflect the relationship of scholars in the field of innovation studies.Secondly, this paper identifies three paradigms of IS（i.e. Schumpeterian innovation paradigm, Neo-Schumpeterian innovation paradigm and Post-Schumpeterian innovation paradigm）based on the research commonality of the scientific communities. This paper expounds the connotation of three paradigms by elaborating and analyzing the research focus, progress and research achievements. Correspondingly, it compares the historical background, innovation role, innovation and governance mode of each paradigm, to present the evolution rule of IS.Finally, the theoretical map of IS is constructed based on the above analysis, which contains the evolution of innovation paradigms and multiple disciplies. The latter shows that more and more disclines need to be integrated with the increasing complexity of innovation, and present a scene of edge crossover and systematic integration of IS.The main contribution of this paper are introducing the analytical framework of Kuhn’s philosophy of science into the field of innovation research and establishing a systematic framework IS, as well as providing a theoretical map of IS which is benefit for the theory foundation of IS.