Abstract:Recently, studies on rhetorical structure of research articles (RAs) have attracted a great attention of researchers. Among the sections of RA, the Introduction section has been investigated extensively while much fewer studies have been done on the Methods section. Besides, the majority of the existing studies focus only on a single discipline or on a comparison between two disciplines. Very little, however, has been conducted to compare the rhetorical structure between two sub-disciplines from one academic field. In this study, therefore, the Methods sections from Management and Marketing, two sub-disciplines of business, were analyzed and compared to identify the rhetorical variations due to disciplinary concepts and practices between these two sub-disciplines. Two sets of corpus were compiled, each with ten Methods sections from two prestigious journals in the fields of Management and Marketing, respectively. Lim’s model (2006) for the rhetorical structure of the Methods section in Management was adopted as the analytical framework. Results of the analysis showed that the chosen analytical framework could not offer sufficient explanations for the rhetorical structure of the Methods sections in the two sub-disciplines of business, even revealing some discrepancies between the framework and the actual texts. Only 30% of the Methods sections in the Management corpus appeared to fit the selected model while in the Marketing corpus, the Methods sections had a greater diversity of rhetorical patterns due to the requirements for publishing in the two selected Marketing journals. The findings in this study may have some implications for writing the Methods sections in the business discipline, such as the need for explicit instruction of writing conventions of this particular section and the guidance to realize the rhetorical differences between these two sub-disciplines for more effective sub-discipline specific writing. Keywords: The Methods Section, Research Article, Management, Marketing, Disciplinary Variations

DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN METHOD AND METHODOLOGY IN ACADEMIC RESEARCH

Application of a Multi-method to Identify a Research Problem

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS

An Introduction to the Philosophy of Methodology

A Qualitative Review on Research Methodology: An Overview

Arguments in the methods section of journal articles in English language education published in high-impact journals

The Researching Method and Methodology of Comparative Education

Research Methods: What's in the Name?

Justifying Knowledge, Justifying Method, Taking Action: Epistemologies, Methodologies, and Methods in Qualitative Research

The fundamental importance of method to theory

The Distinctions Between Theory, Theoretical Framework, and Conceptual Framework

When Methods Meet Motives: methodological pluralism in Social Work research

What are Different Research Approaches? Comprehensive Review of Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Research, Their Applications, Types, and Limitations

A Review on Method Entities in the Academic Literature: Extraction, Evaluation, and Application

THE METHODS SECTIONS IN MANAGEMENT AND MARKETING RESEARCH ARTICLES: RHETORICAL VARIATIONS BETWEEN TWO SUB-DISCIPLINES OF BUSINESS

Demystifying the Disparity between ESP and EGP Methodology

On the Methodology Basis of Linguistics

Discriminating among grounded theory approaches

Distinguishing approach, methodology, method, procedure and technique in process systems engineering

Methodology Section of Graduate School Thesis Manuscripts: A Genre Analysis Probe of Rhetorical Structure

Research methods in engineering design: a synthesis of recent studies using a systematic literature review