Abstract:In this paper, we examine the evolution of the impact of older scholarly articles. We attempt to answer four questions. First, how often are older articles cited and how has this changed over time. Second, how does the impact of older articles vary across different research fields. Third, is the change in the impact of older articles accelerating or slowing down. Fourth, are these trends different for much older articles. To answer these questions, we studied citations from articles published in 1990-2013. We computed the fraction of citations to older articles from articles published each year as the measure of impact. We considered articles that were published at least 10 years before the citing article as older articles. We computed these numbers for 261 subject categories and 9 broad areas of research. Finally, we repeated the computation for two other definitions of older articles, 15 years and older and 20 years and older. There are three conclusions from our study. First, the impact of older articles has grown substantially over 1990-2013. In 2013, 36% of citations were to articles that are at least 10 years old; this fraction has grown 28% since 1990. The fraction of older citations increased over 1990-2013 for 7 out of 9 broad areas and 231 out of 261 subject categories. Second, the increase over the second half (2002-2013) was double the increase in the first half (1990-2001). Third, the trend of a growing impact of older articles also holds for even older articles. In 2013, 21% of citations were to articles >= 15 years old with an increase of 30% since 1990 and 13% of citations were to articles >= 20 years old with an increase of 36%. Now that finding and reading relevant older articles is about as easy as finding and reading recently published articles, significant advances aren't getting lost on the shelves and are influencing work worldwide for years after.

Growth-adjusted impact factor

Growth-adjusted CiteScore

The Statistic Analysis on Changes of Impact Factor of SHPS from Year 2000 to 2003

New Growth Accounting

The Citation-Based Indicator and Combined Impact Indicator-New Options for Measuring Impact

Differences in impact factor across fields and over time

Impact maturity times and citation time windows: The 2-year maximum journal impact factor

Geometric journal impact factors correcting for individual highly cited articles

I3: A Non-Parametric Alternative to the Journal Impact Factor.

A journal's impact factor is influenced by changes in publication delays of citing journals

Improved, Extended, and Total Impact Factor of a Journal

How Can Journal Impact Factors Be Normalized Across Fields of Science? an Assessment in Terms of Percentile Ranks and Fractional Counts

An indicator of journal impact that is based on calculating a journal's percentage of highly cited publications

On the Shoulders of Giants: The Growing Impact of Older Articles

Unraveling the dynamics of growth, aging and inflation for citations to scientific articles from specific research fields

Scopus's source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations

How fractional counting affects the Impact Factor: Normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science

A Modification of Citation-Based Journal Indexes

An indicator of the impact of journals based on the percentage of their highly cited publications

Eigenfactor : Does the Principle of Repeated Improvement Result in Better Journal Impact Estimates than Raw Citation Counts?

The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects