Abstract:Direct preference optimization (DPO) aims to match human preferences while reducing the complexity of reinforcement learning. Traditional methods such as reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) first match reward models with cues and preferences, and then use reinforcement learning (RL) to find policies that maximize rewards. In contrast, DPO simplifies the process by directly optimizing the policy to satisfy preferences without explicit reward functions or RL processes. DPO is a more direct and potentially more efficient way to fine-tune a language model to remain consistent with human feedback. Additionally, OpenAI mentioned that they trained the model by imitating human ratings to help improve RLHF. The next step is to fit the model to a data set containing rich "conditions". For example, the training model generates a panel containing memories, conditions, goals, plans, and future tasks, and uses this panel for training. These conditions transform the "creative writing task" into the task of "distributing materials", reducing entropy in creative writing. Conditional reinforcement learning fine-tuning (C-RLFT) enables large language models to understand and generate human-like text, adapt to new information, and personalize responses while maintaining relevance and coherence. Future improvements include improving conditional panels using RLHF or RLAIF, iteration between datasets and models, aligning models with real-world needs, and building new base models based on 0-order optimization. These directions aim to make large language models more efficient, consistent with human preferences, and able to run in a variety of environments, including edge computing devices. Hello, here is some text without a meaning. This text should show what a printed text will look like at this place. If you read this text, you will get no information. Really? Is there no information? Is there a difference between this text and some nonsense like "Huardest gefburn"? Kjift – not at all! A blind text like this gives you information about the selected font, how the letters are written and an impression of the look. This text should contain all letters of the alphabet and it should be written in the original language. There is no need for special content, but the length of words should match the language.

Contextual panel conditioning and reward models in large language models

Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences

Few-shot In-Context Preference Learning Using Large Language Models

LongReward: Improving Long-context Large Language Models with AI Feedback

Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model

Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part II: Reward Modeling

Improving Context-Aware Preference Modeling for Language Models

Personalized Language Modeling from Personalized Human Feedback

Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Training

Beyond Sparse Rewards: Enhancing Reinforcement Learning with Language Model Critique in Text Generation

RLVF: Learning from Verbal Feedback without Overgeneralization

Confronting Reward Model Overoptimization with Constrained RLHF

Would I Lie To You? Inference Time Alignment of Language Models using Direct Preference Heads

Regularizing Hidden States Enables Learning Generalizable Reward Model for LLMs

Preference-Controlled Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Conditional Text Generation.

Reinforcement Learning without Human Feedback for Last Mile Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models

Self-Rewarding Language Models

Can Large Language Models Understand Context?