Legal and ethical facets of robotic surgery: a suggestion for a guideline

A. P. Rathnayake
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4038/sljfmsl.v15i1.7947
2024-06-25
Abstract:Surgical negligence being a branch of medical negligence is considered a widely extended topic in the territory of Sri Lanka. The central focus of this paper is the use of robotic systems in the performance of surgical procedures and its legal and ethical facets. ‘Robotic Surgery’ is a novel form of technology that is efficient and productive and mostly preferred in sophisticated health systems and used in different fields of medicine namely cardiology, urology, oncology etc. In this method, the robots assist the surgeon in the performance of the surgery. The assistance given by a surgical robot is useful due to the efficiency, fewer incisions, less bleeding, and the lower possibility of infections. However, there are risks as well. If the risk and the injury were a result of the surgeon’s fault, this gives rise to medical malpractice litigation. If the injury is a consequence of the malfunctioning of the surgical robot, it will create a defective product liability on the side of the manufacturer of the robotic system. If the hospital has undertaken the specific surgical venture without sufficient resources, expertise, and institutional stability, that will lead to the hospital's liability. Even, the liability of an error caused by robotic surgery can be imposed in different ways; the ultimate accused will be the health sector. The author’s attempt in this paper is to discuss the legal and ethical implications of a surgeon-patient relationship in the performance of robotic surgery and thereby recommend a guideline to address legal and ethical issues relevant to robotic surgical procedures.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?