Factors contributing to sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

Zhiyang Zhang,Li Guo,Lijing Jia,Hong Duo,Limin Shen,Heling Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1379019
IF: 3.9
2024-05-21
Frontiers in Medicine
Abstract:Background This study aims to systematically assess the risk factors, the overall strength of association, and evidence quality related to sepsis-associated encephalopathy. Methods A systematic search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for cohort or case-control studies published up to August 2023 on risk factors associated with sepsis-related encephalopathy. The selected studies were screened, data were extracted, and the quality was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria. Results A total of 13 studies involving 1,906 participants were included in the analysis. Among these studies, 12 were of high quality, and one was of moderate quality. Our meta-analysis identified six risk factors significantly associated with Serious Adverse Events (SAE). These included APACHE II, SOFA, age, tau protein, and IL-6, which were found to be risk factors with significant effects (standard mean difference SMD: 1.24–2.30), and albumin, which was a risk factor with moderate effects (SMD: −0.55). However, the certainty of evidence for the risk factors identified in this meta-analysis ranged from low to medium. Conclusion This systematic review and meta-analysis identified several risk factors with moderate to significant effects. APACHE II, SOFA, age, tau protein, IL-6, and albumin were associated with sepsis-related encephalopathy and were supported by medium- to high-quality evidence. These findings provide healthcare professionals with an evidence-based foundation for managing and treating hospitalized adult patients with sepsis-related encephalopathy.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?