Preliminary results of a first-in-human study on ESG206, a novel anti-BAFF-R monoclonal antibody, in relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies.

Yuqin Song,Ningjing Lin,Hui Liu,Qing Zhou,Xiaoyan Xing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.e19000
IF: 45.3
2024-06-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e19000 Background: B-cell-Activating Factor-Receptor (BAFF-R), predominantly expressed on the surface of the mature B cells, including malignant B cells, serves as an attractive therapeutic target for the diseases where CD19 or CD20-targeted therapies encounter challenges, such as loss of therapeutic targets or development of resistance. No BAFF-R targeting agent has been approved yet for clinical use to date. ESG206, a recombinant humanized anti-BAFF-R monoclonal antibody modified by glycoengineering for enhanced ADCC effects, is being developed as a treatment for relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell malignancies. Preclinical investigations have successfully validated the antitumor effects of ESG206 across a spectrum of malignant B cell disease models, including lymphoma xenografts which were resistant to Rituximab, and Ibrutinib. This report provides preliminary clinical safety, PK, PD, and efficacy results from an FIH study of ESG206 in patients with R/R B-cell malignancies. Methods: This Phase I, open-label, multicenter dose-escalation study enrolled patients with R/R B-cell malignancies resistant to standard therapy. Dose escalation utilized accelerated titration (1 mg/kg) and Bayesian Optimal Interval design (3, 6, and 9 mg/kg). ESG206 was administered intravenously every 2 weeks, with a 4-week cycle, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. DLT was assessed in the first 28 days. Safety was evaluated per CTCAE 5.0. Tumor assessments every 8 weeks, and peripheral CD20-positive B cell counts as a PD marker were evaluated. Results: As of Jan 30 th , 2024, data cut-off date, 6 pts (3 follicular lymphoma (FL), 3 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)) were enrolled, with a median age of 56 years, 83.3% female; median 2 prior lines of therapy (range 1-3). No DLTs were observed up to 6 mg/kg Q2W. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included anemia (n=2), decreased white blood cell count (n=1), hyperlipidemia (n=1, grade 2), elevated bilirubin (n=1), diarrhea (n=1), infusion reactions (n=1, grade 2), upper respiratory infections (n=1, grade 2), etc. No grade≥3 TRAEs occurred. Among 6 evaluable patients, 1 FL patient (3 mg/kg Q2W) and 1 DLBCL patient (3 mg/kg Q2W) achieved partial response. After 2 cycles of treatment, there was a 39.5% size reduction in the brain lesions of an FL patient who had intracranial metastases in baseline, suggesting that ESG206 may have a therapeutic effect on brain metastases. A significant decrease in the peripheral CD20+B cells was observed at both 1 and 3 mg/kg Q2W dose levels. ESG206 exposure increased with dose escalation across the 1–3 mg/kg dose range. Conclusions: Preliminary data indicates ESG206 is well-tolerated with promising efficacy signals in R/R B-cell malignancies. These encouraging results warrant continued clinical evaluation as the Phase I study progresses. Clinical trial information: NCT05263739 .
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?