Abstract:There is a substantial interest in the potential of carbon credits generated by Reducing Emissions from tropical Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+) and traded on the voluntary carbon market for generating the finance needed to slow forest loss. However, such credits have become marred in controversy. Recent global-scale analysis using a range of methods for estimating the counterfactual rate of deforestation ex post suggest that many REDD+ projects have overestimated their effectiveness at reducing deforestation and consequently issued more credits than can be justified. All such methods include potentially arbitrary choices which can affect the estimate of the treatment effect. In addition, using pixels as the sampling unit, as some of the studies do, can introduce biases. One study which has been widely cited in the debate (Guizar-Coutino et al. 2022) estimated avoided deforestation using statistical matching of pixels and a single set of matching options. We estimate avoided deforestation from the same set of projects using 7-hectare plots rather than pixels to sample deforestation and explore the sensitivity of the results to matching choices (exploring 120 matched sets in total). We filtered the results on three criteria: 1) post-matching covariate balance, 2) proportion of REDD+ samples that were successfully matched, and 3) similarity of trends in deforestation rates prior to REDD+ implementation (parallel trends). While one of the 44 REDD+ projects failed these quality control process, we estimate treatment effects for the remaining 43 projects. There was a substantial correlation between our new estimates and those published in Guizar-Coutino et al. 2022 (0.72 measured in annual percent change, and 0.9 measured in total area change) and our headline estimate of 0.22% per year (95% CI: 0.13 to 0.34) is essentially unchanged. At a time when confidence in the voluntary carbon markets is low, we hope these results provide reassurance that ex-post counterfactual estimates of avoided deforestation are consistent, helping accelerate their widespread adoption and rebuild trust in nature-based climate solutions.

Assessing community reforestation projects for biodiversity improvement and poverty alleviation

Gis-Based Integrated Assessment and Decision Support System for Land Use Planning in Consideration of Carbon Sequestration Benefits

Pan-Canadian review of community-based monitoring projects and their capacity to enhance environmental monitoring programs for cumulative effects assessments

Reconceptualizing 'effectiveness' in Environmental Projects: Can We Measure Values-Related Achievements?

Coupling remote sensing and eDNA to monitor environmental impact: A pilot to quantify the environmental benefits of sustainable agriculture in the Brazilian Amazon

Evaluating Biodiversity Credits Using Metacommunity Modelling

Conceptualising a Socially Resilient Multi-Dimensional Framework for Bottom-Up Evaluation of Community Participation Mechanism in a Watershed Management Space

Estimating the impacts of conservation on ecosystem services and poverty by integrating modeling and evaluation

Assessing and monitoring forest biodiversity: A suggested framework and indicators

Rethinking forest monitoring for more meaningful global forest landscape change assessments

A novel monitoring protocol to evaluate large-scale forest restoration projects in the tropics

Exploring biodiversity and climate change benefits of community-based forest management

Native and non-native species for dryland afforestation: bridging ecosystem integrity and livelihood support

Global reforestation and biodiversity conservation

Remote Sensing Framework for Evaluating Forest Landscape Restoration Projects: Enhancing Accuracy and Effectiveness

Using strategic environmental assessment and project environmental impact assessment to assess ecological connectivity at multiple scales in a national park context

A systems approach framework for evaluating tree restoration interventions for social and ecological outcomes in rural tropical landscapes

A governance framework for the design and evaluation of tree planting schemes

Integrating habitat availability into restoration efforts for biodiversity conservation: Evaluating effectiveness and setting priorities

Sensitivity of estimates of the effectiveness of REDD+ projects to matching specifications and moving from pixels to polygons as the unit of analysis

Assessing the climate benefits of afforestation: processes, methods, and frameworks