Abstract:Neural network models of memory are notorious for catastrophic interference: Old items are forgotten as new items are memorized (French, 1999; McCloskey & Cohen, 1989). While working memory (WM) in human adults shows severe capacity limitations, these capacity limitations do not reflect neural network style catastrophic interference. However, our ability to quickly apprehend the numerosity of small sets of objects (i.e., subitizing) does show catastrophic capacity limitations, and this subitizing capacity and WM might reflect a common capacity. Accordingly, computational investigations (Knops, Piazza, Sengupta, Eger & Melcher, 2014; Sengupta, Surampudi & Melcher, 2014) suggest that mutual inhibition among neurons can explain both kinds of capacity limitations as well as why our ability to estimate the numerosity of larger sets is limited according to a Weber ratio signature. Based on simulations with a saliency map-like network and mathematical proofs, we provide three results. First, mutual inhibition among neurons leads to catastrophic interference when items are presented simultaneously. The network can remember a limited number of items, but when more items are presented, the network forgets all of them. Second, if memory items are presented sequentially rather than simultaneously, the network remembers the most recent items rather than forgetting all of them. Hence, the tendency in WM tasks to sequentially attend even to simultaneously presented items might not only reflect attentional limitations, but also an adaptive strategy to avoid catastrophic interference. Third, the mean activation level in the network can be used to estimate the number of items in small sets, but it does not accurately reflect the number of items in larger sets. Rather, we suggest that the Weber ratio signature of large number discrimination emerges naturally from the interaction between the limited precision of a numeric estimation system and a multiplicative gain control mechanism.

Modelling Working Memory Capacity: Is the Magical Number Four, Seven, or Does it Depend on What You Are Counting?

Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity Are Reflected in Different ERP and EEG Patterns to Task Difficulty

Dissociated roles of the parietal and frontal cortices in the scope and control of attention during visual working memory.

Estimating Working Memory Capacity for Lists of Nonverbal Sounds

Does Visual Working Memory Work As a Few Fixed Slots?

A formal model of capacity limits in working memory

A Precise Measure of Working Memory Reveals Subjects Difficulties Managing Limited Capacity

Visual working memory for simple and complex visual stimuli.

Visual Working-Memory Capacity Load Does Not Modulate Distractor Processing

Object Complexity Influences the Number of Objects Stored in Visual Working Memory

Working Memory Capacity Depends on Attention Control, but Not Selective Attention

Working Memory Capacity Affects Trade-off Between Quality and Quantity Only when Stimulus Exposure Duration is Sufficient: Evidence for the Two-Phase Model

Sequential Presentation Protects Working Memory From Catastrophic Interference

Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: The influences of sustained and selective attention

Quantifying resource sharing in working memory

First direct evidence of two stages in free recall and three corresponding estimates of working memory capacity

Executive Attention, Working Memory Capacity, and a Two-Factor Theory of Cognitive Control

Synaptic Correlates of Working Memory Capacity

Evaluating Working Memory Representations during the Attentional Blink: A Comparative Modeling Approach

Quantifying neural efficiency and neural capacity across the brain during a working memory task using a quadratic model of neural–cognitive relationships

Partial recall: Implications for the discrete slot limit of working memory capacity