Abstract:Purpose Social media platforms are a pervasive technology that continues to define the modern world. While social media has brought many benefits to society in terms of connection and content sharing, numerous concerns remain for the governance of social media platforms going forward, including (but not limited to) the spread of misinformation, hate speech and online surveillance. However, the voice of citizens and other non-experts is often missing from such conversations in information systems literature, which has led to an alleged gap between research and the everyday life of citizens. Design/methodology/approach The authors address this gap by presenting findings from 16 h of online dialog with 25 citizens on social media platform governance. The online dialog was undertaken as part of a worldwide consultation project called "We, the internet", which sought to provide citizens with a voice on a range of topics such as "Digitalization and Me," "My Data, Your Data, Our Data" and "A Strong Digital Public Sphere." Five phases of thematic analysis were undertaken by the authors to code the corpus of qualitative data. Findings Drawing on the Theory of Communicative Action, the authors discuss three dialogical processes critical to citizen discourse: lifeworld reasoning, rationalization and moral action. The findings point toward citizens' perspectives of current and future issues associated with social media platform governance, including concerns around the multiplicity of digital identities, consent for vulnerable groups and transparency in content moderation. The findings also reveal citizens' rationalization of the dilemmas faced in addressing these issues going forward, including tensions such as digital accountability vs data privacy, protection vs inclusion and algorithmic censorship vs free speech. Originality/value Based on outcomes from this dialogical process, moral actions in the form of policy recommendations are proposed by citizens and for citizens. The authors find that tackling these dark sides of digitalization is something too important to be left to "Big Tech" and equally requires an understanding of citizens' perspectives to ensure an informed and positive imprint for change.

Algorithmic Governmentality in Data Capitalism, and Dystopian Bildungsroman: Dave Eggers’ The Circle

THE THEME OF TOTAL SURVEILLANCE IN THE FIELD OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE NOVEL “THE CIRCLE” BY DAVE EGGERS

On phantom publics, clusters, and collectives: be(com)ing subject in algorithmic times

The limits of the imaginary: Challenges to intervening in future speculations of memory, data, and algorithms

Algorithmic governmentality and the space of ethics: Examples from ‘People Analytics’

A Heteronomous Consumer Romance

Algorithmic consumer culture

Thinking Outside the Black-Box: The Case for “Algorithmic Sovereignty” in Social Media

Undetermined: A semi-academic exploration of the future of European data spaces via science fiction

The big data public and its problems: Big data and the structural transformation of the public sphere

Governing the Future: Citizenship as Technology, Empowerment as Technique

Beyond the Digital Public Sphere: Towards a Political Ontology of Algorithmic Technologies

Digital Limits of Government: The Failure of E-Democracy

Dystopian Games: Diagnosing Modernity as the Scene of Tests, Trials and Transformations

Overlit: Digital Architectures of Visibility

Algorithmic Domination in the Gig Economy

Governance by Algorithms, Governance of Algorithms: Human-Machine Politics in Decentralised Autonomous Organisations (DAOs)

Algorithmization of Power: Digital Metamorphoses of Political Regimes and Sovereignty

The dark side of digitalization and social media platform governance: a citizen engagement study

Jérôme Duberry, Artificial Intelligence and Democracy: Risks and Promises of AI-Mediated Citizen–Government Relations (Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2022)

Conquering images and the basis of transformative action