The use of artificial intelligence in the mechanism of judicial control over the execution of decisions in the civil justice system of Ukraine

I.V. Zhukevych
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2024.02.34
2024-05-11
Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence
Abstract:The article is devoted to the issue of the use of artificial intelligence in the mechanism of judicial control over the execution of decisions in the civil judiciary of Ukraine. The development of modern society is characterized by the active use of the latest technologies in all spheres of life. The justice system does not remain aloof from global trends. The widespread use of AI technologies has led to discussions about implementation and use in court procedures in Ukraine. The issue of integration of artificial intelligence into the judicial system of Ukraine in the conditions of martial law is becoming especially urgent. In particular, in the field of judicial control over the execution of decisions in the civil justice system of Ukraine. Artificial intelligence is a good tool to help judges. It can easily find and process information faster than human intelligence. Artificial intelligence cannot replace judges in the mechanism of judicial control over the execution of decisions in the civil justice system of Ukraine. After all, from the point of view of algorithms, legislation and law enforcement can be imperfect. However, if properly applied, it can significantly optimize the work of the judge and the court through involvement. Subject to compliance with European standards, the use of artificial intelligence in the mechanism of judicial control over the execution of decisions in the civil judiciary of Ukraine will be a significant step forward on the way to improving the institution of judicial control over the implementation of decisions in the civil justice of Ukraine. Artificial intelligence must be controlled by the user, because from the point of view of fairness, the generated decisions may violate fundamental human rights. A judge who hears a case regarding the appeal of the actions or inactions of public or private executors in terms of enforcement of widow's judgments issued by courts in civil cases should always be able to review the decisions made by artificial intelligence and the data used for this purpose.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?