Modifying burn care in a low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) to meet global best practice: A burn unit or burn isolation ward?

Amina I. Abubakar,Vinishe Y. Sabo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2024.07.016
IF: 2.609
2024-07-01
Burns
Abstract:The overwhelming burden of burns in LMIC has been well-documented. Though best global practice is for major burns to be treated in burn units, the prohibitive cost makes it difficult. In this article we attempt to present the improvement in outcome recorded over a period of 3 years as we transited from nursing our burns patients in the general surgical wards (Group A), then a separate cubicle within the wards (Group B) and then an isolated burn ward (Group C). Other practices such as physiotherapy, traditional wound dressing and limb splinting remained the same. Data of patients who met criteria for burn unit admission during these periods were analysed and compared for outcome. The groups were matched across age, depth of burn, TBSA and LOHS. There was an improvement in the LA50 at 31.1 %, mean LOHS of 18 ± 3.8 days in group C. Most LMICs do not have functional health insurance schemes for burns patients and overall resources allocated for healthcare cannot support a state-of-the-art burn unit. Our report attempts to encourage LMICs to adapt global practice to their economic reality. Minimal changes like an isolated burn ward, separate shower room for wound dressings, strict hygiene practices and limiting visitor traffic may go a long way to improve burn patient outcome.
dermatology,surgery,critical care medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?