Abstract:Cognitive warfare is not new. Weaker parties in an asymmetric conflict have manipulated information and ideas to convince stronger opponents to not fight (e.g., the Trojan Horse). What is new is the extent to which technologies enable cognitive warfare – resulting in the delegitimization of governments by sowing discord and creating division in order to compel acceptance of political will Information sharing tools enable adversaries to interfere more directly than ever with national political processes as well as citizens minds3. Cognitive warfare is considered a new domain of warfare, along with land, maritime, air, space and cyber (technical). The goal of cognitive warfare attacks is to alter or mislead the thoughts of leaders and operators, of members of entire social or professional classes, of the men and women in an army, or on a larger scale, of an entire population in a given region, country or group of countries and impact territory, influence, service interruptions, transportation, etc. The means could be social cyber, cyber technical, electronic warfare, and broadcast, etc. Senior officers and strategists in the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) claim that AI, neuroscience, and digital applications (e.g., social media) will be able to influence enemies by affecting human cognition directly, Russia’s Gerasimov doctrine talks of the “battlespace of the mind”, Pocheptsov provides examples including creation of fake events and objects and organizing protest actions in Ukraine. Dr Giordano stated, “the brain is the battlefield of the future”. This paper will highlight current examples of cognitive warfare, touch on enabling technologies and relevant social science principles of influence (cognitive and social), highlight existing analytics, introduce the “House model” which identifies pillars of relevant fields of knowledge as well as operationally relevant aspects related to the pillars as potentially helpful framework for thinking about cognitive warfare and identifying needed research.

Psychological Defenses in Cyberspace: Unveiling the Significance of Cognitive Shields in Cybersecurity

An Introduction of System-Scientific Approaches to Cognitive Security

Human Cognition through the Lens of Social Engineering Cyberattacks

Dangers of succumbing to bias in cyber security : An evaluation of the impact of cognitive biases on threat assessments and cyber security strategies

Principles of Security: Human, Cyber, and Biological

Towards a Cognitive Theory of Cyber Deception

A Novel Approach to the Behavioral Aspects of Cybersecurity

An Exploratory Study of Cognitive Sciences Applied to Cybersecurity

Cybersecurity: Past, Present and Future

Emerging Threats in Cyberspace: Implications for National Security Policy and Healthcare Sector

New perspectives on cognitive warfare

Social Engineering Attacks and Defenses in the Physical World vs. Cyberspace: A Contrast Study

Internet-based Social Engineering Attacks, Defenses and Psychology: A Survey

Simulations in Cyber-Security: A Review of Cognitive Modeling of Network Attackers, Defenders, and Users

Dynamic defenses in cyber security: Techniques, methods and challenges

Cyberpsychology can improve cybersecurity leadership in higher education

Reviewing Cyber Security Social Engineering Training and Awareness Programs—Pitfalls and Ongoing Issues

Internet-Based Social Engineering Psychology, Attacks, and Defenses: A Survey

Strategic Approaches to Safeguarding the Digital Future: Insights into Next-Generation Cybersecurity

The New Frontier of Cybersecurity: Emerging Threats and Innovations

Analysing India's Cyber Warfare Readiness and Developing a Defence Strategy