The use of an anti-TCRalphabeta monoclonal antibody to control host-versus-graft reactions in canine marrow allograft recipients conditioned with low dose total body irradiation

A A Barsoukov,P F Moore,R Storb,E B Santos,B M Sandmaier
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199905270-00007
1999-05-27
Transplantation
Abstract:Background: A limitation in the application of marrow transplantation has been complications related to the conditioning regimens that have been intensified to the point where organ toxicities have been common, resulting in morbidity and mortality. Methods: A conditioning regimen consisting of low-dose total body irradiation (TBI*) was used to test whether postgrafting therapy with a monoclonal antibody (mAb) against the T cell receptor (TCR)alphabeta facilitated sustained engraftment of marrow from dog leukocyte antigen (DLA)-identical canine littermates. The anti-TCRalphabeta mAb 15.9D5 was selected for in vivo studies because it induced hyporesponsiveness to allogeneic stimulator cells in mixed leukocyte culture and was not mitogenic in vitro. Results: When recipients of genotypically DLA-identical marrow were conditioned by the barely "lethal" dose of 450 cGy TBI alone, almost 60% of grafts failed (n=39). The remainder engrafted, either in the form of stable mixed donor/host or all donor hematopoietic chimerism. In contrast to results in controls, 5 of 6 dogs that were given, in addition, a loading dose of mAb 15.9D5 of 1 mg/kg on day -1, 450 cGy TBI on day 0, followed by mAb at 0.3 mg/kg/day until day +7, showed sustained engraftment (P=.058). To accomplish a comparable rate of engraftment in the absence of anti-TCRalphabeta antibody, 920 cGy TBI were needed for pretransplant conditioning. Conclusions: Results strongly suggested that in vivo administration of a mAb against TCRalphabeta prevented rejection of allogeneic marrow grafts in the setting of conditioning with a relatively nontoxic but otherwise suboptimal dose of 450 cGy TBI. In vivo administration of m Ab 15.9D5 was well tolerated without any noticeable side effects. The exact mechanism by which the mAb works in vivo is as yet poorly understood, but it does not involve CD3/TCR complex modulation or elimination of T cells from the circulation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?