Abstract:"Curricula-in-action" generally differ from "official" curricula. That is particularly true of clerkship curricula because the practising doctors who supervise medical students' clinical activities are only secondarily educators. Clerkship education is evaluated, however, according to benchmarks set by official curricula. As a result, clerkship evaluations are important points of contact between clinical teachers and medical schools. We reasoned that an evaluation instrument is part of a medical school's official curriculum discourse and clinical teachers' reactions to it are a discourse of curriculum-in-action. We set out to answer the questions: What are clinical teachers' discourses of curriculum-in-action and how do they relate to an official curriculum discourse? Nineteen clerkship placement leads from two hospitals contributing to a single undergraduate medical programme participated. The evaluation instrument was the Manchester Clinical Placement Index, for which validity evidence has been published. Respondents were asked to say how they would react to junior students giving their placements low or high scores for each of 12 items from the Index. After transcription, we conducted a critical discourse analysis (CDA) of their audio-recorded answers. We purposefully selected the six items that elicited the widest spectrum of responses for analysis because quantity of material can compromise the quality of CDA. A dominant discourse of curriculum-in-action defined how teachers should "really" teach and junior students should learn. It deconstructed the need for teachers to be present when students performed clinical tasks because teachers' role was to give critical feedback on case presentations that were coincidental to clinical care. It positioned students at the bottom of a power hierarchy so they had to "struggle" to be taught. It placed respondents in a powerful position relative to "the hospital" and "the university", though there were tensions between respondents, patients, and nurses. Respondents dismissed criticism that was invalid according to their curriculum-in-action, which included most items in an evaluation instrument. There was a contrasting, non-dominant discourse of responding reflectively to feedback, which generated realistic ways of improving students' learning. The strength of respondents' emotions shows just how committed doctors are to students' learning. The strength of their expressions of power, however, explains why many of them teach in their own way rather than according to official curricula. Changes to clinical curricula, our findings suggest, will not be successful unless they are carefully negotiated with practising doctors.

Pulled in all directions: lecturers' accounts of managing critical care courses

Power in clinical teachers' discourses of a curriculum-in-action. Critical discourse analysis

A qualitative study exploring the experiences of advanced clinical practitioner training in emergency care in the South West of England, United Kingdom

Evaluation of choices and time spent on an open online elective course by undergraduate medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic

Core needs and diverse opportunity: A survey of academic clinical lecturers and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic

STAFF PERCEPTIONS OF THE IMPACT OF OVERNIGHT RESIDENT PED CONSULTANTS ON PATIENT CARE AND TRAINING

Caring in the silences: why physicians and surgeons do not discuss emergency care and treatment planning with their patients - an analysis of hospital-based ethnographic case studies in England

Scholarship, teaching practice and educational responsibility: Issues in designing and implementing a quality improvement and evidence-based practice module in the undergraduate curriculum

Evaluation of healthcare professionals' experiences of taking telephone calls from parents of children with congenital heart disease. A risky business

Experiences as a clinical teaching fellow: interviews with clinical teaching fellows in the West Midlands

A novel multimodal needs assessment to inform the longitudinal education program for an international interprofessional critical care team

Preceptors' views of assessing nursing students using a competency based approach

Clinicians' perceptions of medical student teaching in a tertiary hospital

Structures, processes and outcomes of specialist critical care nurse education: An integrative review

Lessons learned from the experiences of patients with long-term conditions: recommendations for enhancing the undergraduate medical curriculum

Stakeholder perceptions of curriculum design, development and delivery for continuing e-learning for nurses

The priorities, challenges, and scope of clinical communication teaching perceived by clinicians from different disciplines: a Hong Kong case study

Clinical educators' experiences of facilitating learning when speaking a different language from both the student and client

Effectiveness of the Introduction to Critical Care in Emergency Medicine Curriculum's Implementation Amongst Trainees Interested in Intensive Care

1HR ON-CALL - Using Simulated ON-CALL to Underpin Experiential Learning in Final Year Medical Students

Overcoming the barriers of teaching physical examination at the bedside: more than just curriculum design