Abstract:The presence of a well designed bankruptcy code is an important part of the ﬁnancialarchitecture in developed economies. By allowing the creditors to seize the assets of theborrowers who fail to make contractual payments, the code generates beneﬁcial ex ante eﬀectson debt capacity and ﬁrm value. By giving the borrowers options to renegotiate their debtobligations and seek bankruptcy protection, the code increases the likelihood that borrowersmay avoid ineﬃcient ex post liquidation. As Hart (1999) notes, the code should balanceex ante ﬁrm value maximization with ex post eﬃciency. The bankruptcy codes in diﬀerentcountries weight this tradeoﬀ diﬀerently and hence vary in terms of the distribution of rightsand powers between borrowers and lenders.In this paper, we provide an inter-temporal framework to examine how the creditors’liquidation rights and the distribution of ex post bargaining powers inﬂuence the ﬁrm’s in-vestment and ﬁnancing decisions, and aﬀect ex ante ﬁrm value. We show that strongerequityholders’ bargaining power lowers debt capacity, reduces ﬁrm value, and discouragesgrowth option exercising. Our calibration suggests that the quantitative eﬀects of ex poststrategic renegotiation on ex ante ﬁrm value may be large.Our paper provides an attempt to integrate ﬁnancial architecture into the theory of in-vestment (growth option exercising), by building on two strands of literature: investment anddebt pricing. We extend the real options approach to investment, pioneered by McDonaldand Siegel (1986) and Brennan and Schwartz (1985), to allow for capital structure decisionsunder strategic debt service. We also draw insights from corporate debt pricing/capital struc-ture literature, which focuses on leverage and security pricing after investment has alreadybeen made (Merton (1974), Black and Cox (1976), and Leland (1994)). Our paper bridgesthe gap between these two strands of literature by characterizing the optimal investment andﬁnancing decisions, and the option value of waiting in closed form. We show that the inter-action between ﬁnancing and investment decisions in the presence of strategic debt servicegenerates new insights and also quantitatively important eﬀects on ex ante ﬁrm value.

Double Marginalization Because of External Financing: Capacity Investment Under Uncertainty

Investment, Liquidity, and Financing under Uncertainty

Product Innovation Investment under Bankruptcy Threat

Subsidized Capacity Investment under Uncertainty

Nber Working Paper Series Investment under Uncertainty with Financial Constraints

Tilburg University Subsidized Capacity Investment under Uncertainty

Investment under Uncertainty with Financial Constraints

Investment under Uncertainty with Strategic Debt Service

Product Innovation Investment under Technological Uncertainty and Financial Constraints∗

Corporate Investment and Financing Dynamics

R&D, Capital Investments, and Financing under Repeated Moral Hazard

A Dynamic Tradeoff Theory for Financially Constrained Firms ∗

Debt Maturity Choice and Firms' Investment

Market timing, investment, and risk management

Asset Substitution and Underinvestment: A Dynamic View

Debt Maturity Choices, Multi-Stage Investments and Financing Constraints

Irreversible Investment, Ambiguity and Equity Default Swaps

Investment under uncertainty: Timing and capacity optimization

SME Investment and Financing under Asymmetric Information

Corporate investment and financing under asymmetric information

Debt, Default, and Risk Management: Corporate Policies Under Incomplete Markets