Enantiomers of bronchodilating beta2-adrenoceptor agonists: is there a cause for concern?

B Waldeck
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70414-8
Abstract:All bronchodilating beta2-adrenoceptor agonists in current clinical use are derivatives of adrenaline and are available as racemates. Whereas the vast majority of the pharmacologic and clinical documentation has been made with the racemates, there are a few studies with the individual enantiomers. It thus appears that all established pharmacologic effects of racemic beta2-agonists reside in the (R)-enantiomer, with the (S)-enantiomer being virtually inactive. In recent years the suspicion has been raised that the (S)-enantiomer of the beta2-agonists is responsible for induction of airway hyperreactivity. This suspicion is based primarily on results obtained in guinea pigs exposed to (S)-enantiomers of beta2-agonists. A number of experiments in vitro have been undertaken to find a mechanism of action for these observations in vivo. Most of the results obtained are equivocal. However, the observation that (S)-salbutamol may cause mobilization of intracellular Ca2+, apparently by means of a cholinergic mechanism, deserves further investigation. The clinical studies are focused on the enantiomers of salbutamol. They confirm the preclinical findings that the pulmonary, as well as the extrapulmonary, effects of salbutamol reside in the (R)-enantiomer. The studies available so far do not convincingly show clinically significant airway hyperreactivity after exposure to the (S)-enantiomer. Further studies are needed to settle this issue.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?