Neoadjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) + chemotherapy (chemo) vs chemo in patients (pts) with resectable NSCLC: 4-year update from CheckMate 816.

Jonathan Spicer,Nicolas Girard,Mariano Provencio,Changli Wang,Tetsuya Mitsudomi,Mark M. Awad,Everett E. Vokes,Janis M. Taube,Lorena Lupinacci,Gene B. Saylors,Fumihiro Tanaka,Moishe Liberman,Sung Yong Lee,Aurelia Alexandru,Manolo D’Arcangelo,Phuong Tran,Javed Mahmood,Vishwanath Suresh Gharpure,Apurva Bhingare,Patrick M. Forde

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.17_suppl.lba8010

IF: 45.3

2024-06-06

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:LBA8010 Background: The phase 3 CheckMate 816 study established neoadjuvant NIVO + chemo as a standard of care for eligible pts with resectable NSCLC. Here, we report the 4-year survival update from this study, representing the longest follow-up among all global phase 3 studies evaluating neoadjuvant or perioperative immunotherapy-based treatments. Methods: Adults with stage IB (≥ 4 cm)–IIIA (per AJCC v7) resectable NSCLC, ECOG PS ≤ 1, and no known EGFR/ ALK alterations were randomized 1:1 to receive NIVO 360 mg + chemo Q3W or chemo alone Q3W for 3 cycles, followed by surgery. Event-free survival (EFS) and pathologic complete response (pCR; both per blinded independent review) were primary endpoints and were both statistically significant. Overall survival (OS) was a key secondary endpoint. Exploratory analyses included efficacy by pCR status and extent of resection. Results: At the 23 Feb 2024 database lock (median follow-up, 57.6 mo), NIVO + chemo continued to improve EFS vs chemo (median, 43.8 mo vs 18.4 mo; HR [95% CI], 0.66 [0.49–0.90]); 4-year EFS rates were 49% vs 38%. EFS favored NIVO + chemo vs chemo regardless of whether pts had lobectomy or pneumonectomy (Table), with 56%–57% vs 40%–43% of pts without disease recurrence at 4 years. NIVO + chemo also continued to show OS improvement vs chemo (HR [98.36% CI], 0.71 [0.47–1.07]; P = 0.0451; median OS was not reached [NR] in both arms, and the significance boundary was not met at this interim analysis). An OS improvement of 13% was sustained over time for NIVO + chemo vs chemo; 4-year OS rates were 71% vs 58%. Pts in the NIVO + chemo arm who had pCR continued to have improved OS vs those who did not (HR [95% CI], 0.08 [0.02–0.34]); 4-year OS rates, 95% vs 63%); a similar trend was seen in the chemo arm, although few pts had pCR with chemo (n = 4). No new safety signals were observed at this update. Additional survival analyses in pt subgroups and by ctDNA levels will be presented. Conclusions: In this 4-year analysis from CheckMate 816, neoadjuvant NIVO + chemo sustained EFS and OS separation vs chemo over time and demonstrated the long-term survival benefit of having pCR in pts with resectable NSCLC. These data provide the first understanding of the long-term benefits of neoadjuvant immunotherapy when added to chemo, reinforcing neoadjuvant NIVO + chemo as a standard of care, and providing a benchmark to assess the benefits of all perioperative immunotherapy-based treatments. Clinical trial information: NCT02998528 . [Table: see text]

oncology