The influence of prostate volume on pathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy: A single-center retrospective study

Qinchen Li,Zitong Yang,Zhize Wang,Jiazhu Sun,Chao Wen,Huaqing Yan,Haixiang Shen,Weiyu Wang,Bohan Xu,Jianjian Xiang,Xiaodong Teng,Cheng Zhang,Xiangyi Zheng,Liping Xie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000036526
IF: 1.6
2024-02-23
Medicine
Abstract:A recent study published in 2019 indicated that prostate cancer (Pca) is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer mortality among men in the U.S. [ 1 ] Currently, radical prostatectomy (RP) is the gold standard treatment for localized PCa that decreases cancer-specific mortality. [ 2 ] A prostate biopsy is widely recognized as a clinical gold standard for the diagnosis of PCa. It is a common clinical phenomenon that approximately 30% to 50% of patients with low-risk PCa experienced pathological outcome upgrading in postoperative pathology. [ 3–5 ] Therefore, it is imperative to identify factors correlated with pathological outcome updating or adverse pathological outcome among PCa patients. Although evidence from numerous studies has indicated PV may be associated with adverse pathological outcomes in PCa, [ 6–12 ] some research has shown that there is no actual relationship between the 2. [ 13 , 14 ]
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?