Abstract:Purpose This study aims to investigate the effect of corporate governance (CG) mechanisms (board size, independent commissioner and ownership concentration) on green innovation (GI) in publicly traded companies of Indonesia as an emerging market. Design/methodology/approach Archival data relating to CG and GI were collected for five years (2016–2020). A total of 640 observations were obtained and analyzed using a random effect model. Findings The results indicate that effective governance mechanisms can encourage GI implementation to promote company sustainability. Respectively, the board size, independent commissioner and ownership concentration positively and significantly affect GI. These results imply that the optimal board size will result in effective coordination and cooperation in making GI decisions. Likewise, the proportional independent commissioners in the board structure will serve an effective oversight function. And concentrated ownership can influence executives to prefer innovation policies, such as GI. Research limitations/implications First, only a few CG mechanisms were used in this investigation. Therefore, further research needs to consider other mechanisms such as the number of commissioners, internal and external commissioners. Second, this research focused solely on Indonesia as an emerging market. Future research can be expanded to include countries with other emerging market characteristics. Third, different GI measurements from this study should be considered in future studies. Practical implications Practically, the results of this study are expected to provide policy recommendations, including optimizing the CG mechanisms as a control tool to achieve organizational sustainability through GI according to stakeholder expectations. This can be achieved by optimizing the size of the board of directors. The low value of the board size coefficient implies that optimization of board size is needed to encourage GI. The company can gain directors’ competence, experience and skill to increase innovation performance. In addition, maximizing the role of independent commissioners in overseeing is required for continuous innovation activities. Finally, the control of large shareholders is also necessary to encourage the implementation of GI because they could influence management to make innovative decisions. Originality/value This study extends and contributes to the extant CG and GI literature. There is little evidence that reveals how CG mechanisms affect GI, particularly in emerging market settings. The findings offer some important evidence for improving CG in driving GI implementation.

The synergistic effect of green innovation and governance in carbon neutrality: Insights from Japanese companies

The impact of green innovation on the carbon performance of Chinese manufacturing enterprises: Moderating role of internal governance

Evaluating the Innovation-Boosting Potential of Low-Carbon Pilot Policies: A Multi-Subject Co-Governance Perspective

Corporate governance and green innovation: international evidence

Toward carbon neutrality: How will environmental regulatory policies affect corporate green innovation?

Corporate governance and carbon emissions performance: International evidence on curvilinear relationships

Revisiting firm innovation and environmental performance: New evidence from Japanese firm-level data

Corporate governance: Does it matter management of carbon emission performance? An empirical analyses of Indian companies

Sustainable city development from the perspective of corporate green innovation and governance

Investigation on how carbon markets and digital transformation affect green innovation: evidence from Chinese listed companies

Corporate Climate Strategies and Financing the Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy in Japan

Impact of country governance mechanisms on carbon emissions performance of multinational entities

Board gender diversity, environmental innovation and corporate carbon emissions

The Green Chain: A Carbon Neutral Path from Climate Risk to Environmental, Social and Governance Performance

The impact of digital transformation on corporate green governance under carbon peaking and neutrality goals: Evidence from China

Shifting focus from end-of-pipe treatment to source control: ESG ratings' impact on corporate green innovation

Hope-hype of green innovation, corporate governance index, and impact on firm financial performance: a comparative study of Southeast Asian countries

Green innovation and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from Chinese listed companies

Does corporate governance induce green innovation? An emerging market evidence

Does Environmental Governance Mitigate the Detriment of Greenwashing on Innovation in China?

Can ESG Disclosure Stimulate Corporations' Sustainable Green Innovation Efforts? Evidence from China