Evaluating researchers for the project

E Barron

Abstract:This is the second in a series on a system-wide geriatric-care marketing initiative undertaken at Franciscan Health System, Chadds Ford, Pa. In the first article, the author outlined the process of gaining the voluntary involvement of internal market segments. In this article, the author details the process of putting out a request for proposal to market-research vendors.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

SRI Gallup describes selection process

D Jackson

Abstract:This is the third article in a series on Franciscan Health System's geriatric marketing initiative. Last month FHS's director of marketing and planning, described the process of putting out a request for proposal to market research vendors. In this article, an SRI Gallup senior vice president tells how his firm landed the project and how clients can avoid selection pitfalls.
Evaluating the Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing a Novel Referral System for Outpatient Geriatric Services: The Geri-Hub Quality Improvement Initiative

Guillaume Lim Fat,Kristina M Kokorelias,Erica Foronda,Bindhu Sadasivan,Lindy Romanovsky

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329241274482

2024-08-30

Abstract:Background: In healthcare systems prioritizing care of older adults, resource limitations and escalating demand often impede access to outpatient specialized geriatric services. Objectives: This study, theoretically guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), aimed to explore barriers and facilitators in implementing a centralized "Geri-Hub." The Geri-Hub is a centralized intake system established within 2 hospital systems to coordinate outpatient and community-based services for older adults, aiming to connect them with the most appropriate care in a timely manner. Methods: Qualitative insights were gathered from healthcare professionals at 2 academic institutions in the process of consolidating services. Through open-ended surveys and semi-structured interviews, we solicited feedback on referral management, waiting times, and overall work experiences. Results: Thirteen frequently referring providers and a cohort of 9 geriatricians, along with 4 administrators, contributed to the study. Geriatricians emphasized streamlined referrals, flexible scheduling for urgent cases, and a target wait time of 3 months. Administrators stressed standardized referral procedures, defined roles, and accessible referral information. Discussion: The findings underscored the need for straightforward referral processes, enhanced communication on referral statuses, and reduced wait times. Optimizing these processes could potentially mitigate resource utilization issues and improve patient outcomes in healthcare systems. This research highlights the critical role of timely access to geriatric services during transformative phases in healthcare delivery.
Benefits of Structured Engagement with Target Audiences of a Health Website: Study Design for a Multi-Case Study (Preprint)

Jennifer Tieman,Virginia Lewis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.20655

2020-05-25

Abstract:BACKGROUND Access to evidence and practice knowledge is an important precursor to best practice health care. However, while availability is a requirement it is not necessarily sufficient to ensure reach into and uptake by intended audiences. Planning, implementing and evaluating engagement with intended audience’s offers one mechanism to identify ways that increased interaction and integration could be achieved. Since 2008, the CareSearch website has provided online palliative care evidence and information nationally in Australia to support health and aged care professionals, patients, carers and families to make informed decisions about care at the end of life. Having become an established presence in the palliative care sector, CareSearch is seeking to extend its reach, and ensure that the utility of the website is maximised for all target groups. As part of its deliverables cycle, CareSearch is undertaking a project to design, implement and evaluate a structured engagement activity in three different target groups (Aged care; Allied health; and Patients, carers and families). OBJECTIVE This paper describes the development of an evidence-based approach to understanding context to support a targeted engagement approach to influence reach and uptake of online resources. A mixed methods formative and summative evaluation study design for assessing the potential value of the approach has been developed. METHODS The project commenced with a design meeting between the CareSearch Director and an evaluation researcher about the purpose of the project, rationale for the intended audiences, and required outcomes specified in the grant application. A literature review of approaches used in knowledge translation, implementation science, politics and social marketing, was undertaken. The evaluation researcher then met to finalise the Engagement Framework and to formalise a template for documenting context based on relevant elements identified in the literature review. The proposed approach was then formally reviewed by the national CareSearch Advisory Group to determine face validity. RESULTS An Engagement Framework comprising eight steps was developed. This outlines a series of tasks to be undertaken by the CareSearch Project staff working with the three target groups. A process/formative evaluation schedule was designed to collect data using qualitative methods to explore the experiences of participants, including staff implementing the engagement activities. Further details of the impact/summative evaluation will be formulated alongside the sector specific Action Plans and will include web metrics and qualitative feedback from stakeholders. The three target groups will enable a cross-case comparison approach. CONCLUSIONS The use and impact of online resources often stops at web visits and page views. A structured approach to engagement with intended user groups may provide insights into how different groups find, use and value resources. CLINICALTRIAL
Overcoming the Challenges Inherent in Conducting Design Research in Mental Health Settings: Lessons from St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton's Pre and Post-Occupancy Evaluation

Catherine Ahern,Margaret C McKinnon,Peter J Bieling,Heather McNeely,Karen Langstaff

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586715602219

HERD

Abstract:Objective: Conducting high-quality design research in a mental health setting presents significant challenges, limiting the availability of high-quality evidence to support design decisions for built environments. Here, we outline key approaches to overcoming these challenges. Background: In conducting a rigorous post-occupancy evaluation of a newly built mental health and addictions facility, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, we identified a number of systematic barriers associated with conducting design research in mental health settings. Methods: Our approach to overcoming these barriers relied heavily upon (i) selecting established measures and methods with demonstrated efficacy in a mental health context, (ii) navigating institutional protocols designed to protect vulnerable members of this population, and (iii) designing innovative data collection strategies to increase participation in research by individuals with mental illness. Each of these approaches drew heavily on the expert knowledge of mental health settings and the experiences with mental health, facilities management, and research of a research team that was well integrated within the parent institution. Conclusions: Engaging multiple stakeholders (e.g., care providers, patients, ethics board, and hospital administrators) contributed their trust and support of the research. Traditionally, post-occupancy evaluation researchers are independent of the facilities they research, yet this is not an effective approach in mental health settings. We found that, in working toward solutions to the three obstacles we described, having team members who were well "networked" within the parent institution was necessary. This approach can turn "gatekeepers" into champions for patients' engagement in the research, which is essential in generating high-quality evidence.
What value market research?

L Maris

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808236

1993-08-07

Abstract:Whether you have just left your hotel, purchased a new car or eaten at a roadside café, the chances are someone will have asked your views about their services, products and delivery. Why? Perhaps because the market oriented business knows better than to assume it understands its customers. A safer approach is to seek their views through market research, and that is the approach the new Quality Development Awards initiated by the BDJ, Denplan and Colgate have taken.
An academic-marketing collaborative to promote depression care: a tale of two cultures

Richard L Kravitz,Ronald M Epstein,Robert A Bell,Aaron B Rochlen,Paul Duberstein,Caroline H Riby,Anthony F Caccamo,Christina K Slee,Camille S Cipri,Debora A Paterniti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.003

Abstract:Objectives: Commercial advertising and patient education have separate theoretical underpinnings, approaches, and practitioners. This paper aims to describe a collaboration between academic researchers and a marketing firm working to produce demographically targeted public service anouncements (PSAs) designed to enhance depression care-seeking in primary care. Methods: An interdisciplinary group of academic researchers contracted with a marketing firm in Rochester, NY to produce PSAs that would help patients with depressive symptoms engage more effectively with their primary care physicians (PCPs). The researchers brought perspectives derived from clinical experience and the social sciences and conducted empirical research using focus groups, conjoint analysis, and a population-based survey. Results were shared with the marketing firm, which produced four PSA variants targeted to gender and socioeconomic position. Results: There was no simple, one-to-one relationship between research results and the form, content, or style of the PSAs. Instead, empirical findings served as a springboard for discussion and kept the creative process tethered to the experiences, attitudes, and opinions of actual patients. Reflecting research findings highlighting patients' struggles to recognize, label, and disclose depressive symptoms, the marketing firm generated communication objectives that emphasized: (a) educating the patient to consider and investigate the possibility of depression; (b) creating the belief that the PCP is interested in discussing depression and capable of offering helpful treatment; and (c) modelling different ways of communicating with physicians about depression. Before production, PSA prototypes were vetted with additional focus groups. The winning prototype, "Faces," involved a multi-ethnic montage of formerly depressed persons talking about how depression affected them and how they improved with treatment, punctuated by a physician who provided clinical information. A member of the academic team was present and consulted closely during production. Challenges included reconciling the marketing tradition of audience segmentation with the overall project goal of reaching as broad an audience as possible; integrating research findings across dimensions of words, images, music, and tone; and dealing with misunderstandings related to project scope and budget. Conclusion: Mixed methods research can usefully inform PSAs that incorporate patient perspectives and are produced to professional standards. However, tensions between the academic and commercial worlds exist and must be addressed. Practice implications: While rewarding, academic-marketing collaborations introduce tensions which must be addressed.
Evaluating the Strengthening a Palliative Approach in Long Term Care

Sharon Kaasalainen,Genevieve Thompson,Lorraine Venturato,Abigail Wickson-Griffiths,Paulette Hunter,Lynn McCleary

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2024.03.080

IF: 7.802

2024-05-01

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Abstract:Despite the high mortality rates in LTC, most LTC homes do not have a formalized palliative care program. The objective of this proposed research was to implement and evaluate the Strengthening a Palliative Approach in Long Term Care (SPA-LTC; www.spaltc.ca ) program. Specifically, we explored its feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects (i.e., resident comfort, use of emergency department at end of life, and location of resident death).

geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology
The Symphony of Consumer Partnering and Clinical Governance: An Organizational Review Using the RE‐AIM Framework

Jodie Nixon,Emily Steel,Warren Stubbs,Amber Williamson,Javed Khan,Phillip Carswell,Anne Coccetti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70095

2024-11-17

Health Expectations

Abstract:Introduction Partnering with Consumers in healthcare systems is now widely accepted and mandated in many countries. Despite this acceptance, there is minimal information regarding the best practice of how to successfully establish systems to embed this practice into healthcare systems. Methods This evaluation used the RE‐AIM implementation framework to retrospectively analyse data from a 3‐year timeline to review the events relating to the transition of Consumer Partnering into a Clinical Governance Unit. Data was sourced via Phase 1 – a focus group to establish a 3‐year timeline of events, enablers and barriers, and Phase 2 – a quantitative and qualitative semi‐structured interview to review systems that had been developed to support embedding partnering with consumers into Clinical Governance. Results Five primary enablers and five barriers to successfully embedding a Consumer Partnering Team into a Clinical Governance Unit were identified. Enablers included Executive sponsorship and ownership of the value of partnering with consumers, Executive leadership influence on local area uptake, an organization‐wide network, valuing via remuneration, and a centralized orientation and onboarding programme for Consumer Partners. Barriers included skills and attitudes of committee chairs, the size of the Directorate (smaller local areas can be easier to influence change), patient feedback data requires interpretation to be useful, staff turnover can reduce the relationships with Consumer Partners, and financial insecurity is a barrier to implementation and maintenance. Conclusions This article described how an Australian Health Service embedded a Consumer Partnering Team into a Clinical Governance Unit to ensure that partnering became business as usual practice. Enablers, barriers, and unintended consequences can be used as learnings for other organizations to develop a similar approach. Patient or Public Contribution Two Consumer Partners with lived experience of the health service, and members of the organizations committee structures are part of the evaluation team. As team members, the consumers participated as equal contributors in evaluation design, analysis of the focus group and interview data, and contribution to the writing and review of the manuscript. Two Consumer Partners with lived experience of the health service, and members of the committee structures participated in the focus groups and the interviews.

public, environmental & occupational health,health care sciences & services,health policy & services
Barriers and Facilitators in the Uptake of Integrated Care Pathways for Older Patients by Healthcare Professionals: A Qualitative Analysis of the French National "Health Pathway of Seniors for Preserved Autonomy" Pilot Program: Barriers and Facilitators for Adhesion of Healthcare Professionals in Integrated Care for Older Patients: A Qualitative Assessment Based on the French National Experiment: 'Health Pathway of Seniors for Preserved Autonomy' (PAERPA)

Lorette Averlant,Mathieu Calafiore,François Puisieux,Claire Ramez,Fanny Sarrazin,Maxime Lotin,Romain Naessens,Apolline Delesalle,Gracia Adotey,Pascal Harduin,Nathalie Leveque,Delphine Dambre,Marguerite-Marie Defebvre,Carla Di Martino,Jean-Baptiste Beuscart

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5483

2021-04-22

Abstract:Introduction: Integrated care is a particularly promising approach in geriatrics - a field in which the medical, psychological and social issues are often complex. The uptake of integrated care by healthcare professionals (HCPs) is essential but varies markedly. The objective of the present study of healthcare professionals was to identify barriers to and facilitators of commitment to integrated care for seniors. Methods: We performed a two-step, qualitative study, comprising (i) six qualitative, semi-directive series of interviews with HCPs (hospital practitioners, family physicians, nurses and pharmacists) who agreed or disagreed to take part in the French national "Health Pathway of Seniors for Preserved Autonomy" (PAERPA) pilot program; and (ii) an analysis of the pooled results, in order to identify common concerns among the healthcare professionals. Results: We identified four key "barrier" and "facilitator" topics shared by HCPs who had committed to the pilot program and those who had not: (i) awareness of and/or interest in geriatric medicine and team working, (ii) the presence of a care coordinator; (iii) the provision of information about the program and about the patient, and communication between HCPs, and (iv) personal benefits for the HCPs and the patients. Key conclusions: The four key topics identified in this large qualitative study of several healthcare professions should be considered during the design and dissemination of integrated care pathways for older patients.
Collaborating toward equity in Pennsylvania: The Age-Friendly Care, PA project

Diane Berish,Erica Husser,Jenny Knecht-Fredo,Jacqueline Sabol,George Garrow,Judith Hupcey,Donna Fick

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14073

Abstract:Objective: To collaboratively implement the age-friendly health systems framework, known as the 4Ms: What Matters, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility, at The Primary Health Network (PHN), a federally qualified health center. Data sources: Data were collected from PHN electronic medical records (EMRs) for individuals over age 65 from December 30, 2019 to December 24, 2021 and from Project ECHO© attendance and evaluation surveys. Study design: The telementoring educational program, Project ECHO©, was used to engage PHN health care professionals working in rural areas of Pennsylvania to incorporate the 4Ms into their practice starting with the annual wellness visit (AWV). Project ECHO© was launched at three primary care sites. After 18 months, it was then disseminated to an additional 18 sites creating pilot and comparison groups. Outcomes included codesigned patient process metrics using EMR data and project ECHO© participant data. Data collection methods: EMR data were generated by system reports created by PHN's quality assurance program manager. Project ECHO© data were collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools. Outcomes were aggregated, analyzed for trends over time, and compared between groups. Principal findings: All nine process outcomes increased from baseline to follow-up at the three initial sites, ranging from 4% to 43% g. At year two, the three initial sites had higher rates on AWVs (pilot 24%, comparison 12%; p < 0.0001), Advance Care Planning (New on file, pilot 8%, comparison 2%; Discussed with patient, pilot 18%, comparison 13%; Patient declined, pilot 0%, comparison 0%; p = 0.0001), Dementia Screening (pilot 24%, comparison 12%; p < 0.0001), Fall Risk Management (pilot 43%, comparison 10%; p < 0.0001), and Mobility Goal (pilot 19%, comparison 9%; p < 0.0001); and lower rates on High-Risk Medication Elimination (pilot 54%, comparison, 63%, p < 0.02). Conclusions: Access to high-quality geriatric care for rural older adults can be improved by increasing health care professionals' knowledge of the 4Ms, beginning with its incorporation into the AWV.
An evidence-based method for assessing the value of a search tool: a pilot study

Donald Stanley Pearson,Stevo Roksandic,Jill Kilanowski

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.287

Abstract:Objective: The objective of this study was to develop an evidence-based method with a set of metrics that could be used to assess an information search tool. Methods: This pilot study analyzed a two-group convenience sample of graduate nursing students and resident physicians. The intervention group received ten minutes of instruction on a familiar search tool (eSearcher). Each group was provided one prompt to search for clinical guidelines on a given topic within their scope of practice and asked to find the best result using only eSearcher (intervention group) or specifically excluding eSearcher (comparison group). Three measurements of search results were employed: time elapsed to complete the search, an accuracy score, and a participant-reported score of confidence in the result. Results: Forty-two students participated in this study (23 graduate nursing students and 19 resident physicians). The intervention group consisted of 22 participants (12 graduate nursing students and 10 resident physicians), and the comparison group consisted of 20 participants (11 graduate nursing students and 9 resident physicians). The intervention group had lower mean ranks in both accuracy and confidence compared to the comparison (not eSearcher) group, although these differences were not significant. However, the intervention (eSearcher) group had significantly longer search times compared to the comparison (not eSearcher) group. Discussion: These findings provided new insights into the performance of the search tool and how users felt about their search experience. The quantitative evidence gained from this study led directly to an informed decision to explore other options for search tools. The evidence-based methods and process developed in this pilot study will enable similar studies to test other student groups and other search tools, leading to better informed purchasing and instructional decisions.
Implementation of a Standardized Screening Process to Increase Palliative Care Referrals in Primary Care: An Evidence-Based Quality Approach

Amy M Smith

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NJH.0000000000001064

2024-08-28

Abstract:Despite initiatives to increase palliative care awareness, referrals in primary care settings are still primarily based on provider judgment, causing a lack of appropriate referrals and disparities in access to palliative care resources. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to develop and implement an evidence-based, standardized palliative care referral protocol to increase the palliative care referral rate for eligible patients at a primary care clinic. The project used a preimplementation and postimplementation design with the use of the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework to successfully implement and evaluate the standardized referral process. Over the 10-month project period, the palliative care referral rate increased from 2% (4/193) preimplementation to 11% (16/147) postimplementation of the standardized referral process, which is an increase of 9%. Taking into consideration the potential impact of multiple extraneous variables, there was an overall decrease of 69% in emergency room visits and 73% in hospitalizations for patients who received a palliative care referral. These outcomes support expansion of the standardized referral process throughout other primary care clinics to increase palliative care referrals and sustain a high level of quality patient care.
Evaluating strategies to recruit health researchers to participate in online survey research

Elizabeth R. Stevens,Charles M. Cleland,Amelia Shunk,Omar El Shahawy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02275-6

2024-07-19

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Abstract:Engaging researchers as research subjects is key to informing the development of effective and relevant research practices. It is important to understand how best to engage researchers as research subjects.

health care sciences & services
Facilitators and barriers to implementing a specialized care unit for persons with cognitive impairment in an acute geriatric hospital: a process evaluation

Laura Adlbrecht,Melanie Karrer,Nicole Helfenberger,Eva Ziegler,Adelheid Zeller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04612-8

IF: 4.07

2024-01-07

BMC Geriatrics

Abstract:Implementing dementia care interventions in an acute hospital poses multiple challenges. To understand factors influencing the implementation, in-depth knowledge about specific facilitators and barriers is necessary. The aim of this study was to identify facilitators and barriers to implementing an interprofessional, multicomponent intervention of a specialized unit for persons with cognitive impairment in an acute geriatric hospital.

geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology
Implementation of a multimodal home-based rehabilitation intervention after discharge from inpatient geriatric rehabilitation (GeRas): an early qualitative process evaluation

Catharina Roth,Leonie Maier,Bastian Abel,Patrick Roigk,Kilian Rapp,Oliver Schmidberger,Martin Bongartz,Simone Maier,Isabel Wirth,Brigitte Metz,Désirée Immel,Benjamin Finger,Sabine Schölch,Gisela Büchele,Oliver Deuster,Hans‑Helmut Koenig,Sophie Gottschalk,Judith Dams,William Micol,Jürgen M. Bauer,Michel Wensing,Petra Benzinger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05277-7

IF: 4.07

2024-09-01

BMC Geriatrics

Abstract:Geriatric rehabilitation aims at increasing physical and social activity and maintaining the functional reserve of older people. However, the continuity of geriatric rehabilitation in the outpatient setting is limited due to a lack of structured aftercare programs. In order to overcome this, a three-month multimodal home-based intervention program (GeRas) was implemented. The aim of this early qualitative process evaluation was to assess GeRas in terms of perceived reach, effectiveness/efficacy, adoption/uptake, implementation, and maintenance/sustainability (Domains within the RE-AIM Framework) from the perspective of patients who received the intervention and healthcare providers who were involved in the delivery of the intervention.

geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology
Communication processes in an advance care planning initiative: A socio-ecological perspective for service evaluation

Marie C Haverfield,Jessica Ma,Anne Walling,David B Bekelman,Cati Brown-Johnson,Natalie Lo,Karl A Lorenz,Karleen F Giannitrapani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241277394

IF: 5.7133

2024-09-11

Palliative Medicine

Abstract:Palliative Medicine, Ahead of Print. Background:Advance care planning initiatives are becoming more widespread, increasing expectations for providers to engage in goals of care conversations. However, less is known about how providers communicate advance care planning within and throughout a health care system.Aim:To explore perspectives of communication processes in the rollout of an advance care planning initiative.Design:Theoretically informed secondary analysis of 31 semi-structured interviews.Setting/Participants:Key partners in a Veterans Health Administration goals of care initiative.Results:Using the constant comparative approach followed by qualitative mapping of themes to the layers of the Socio-Ecological Model, four themes and corresponding Socio-Ecological layers were identified: Goals of Care Communication Training (Policy, Community, and Institutional) requires more resources across sites and better messaging to reduce provider misconceptions and promote an institutional culture invested in advance care planning; Interprofessional Communication (Interpersonal) suggests care team coordination is needed to facilitate continuity in goals of care messaging; Communication in Documentation (Institutional, Interpersonal, and Intrapersonal) highlights the need for capturing the context for goals of care preferences; and Patient/Family Communication (Interpersonal and Intrapersonal) encourages offering materials and informational resources early to facilitate rapport building and readiness to determine goals of care.Conclusions:Findings support the need for initiatives to incorporate an evaluation of how goals of care are discussed beyond the interpersonal exchange between patient and provider and signal opportunities for applying the Socio-Ecological Model to better understand goals of care communication processes, including opportunities to improve initiation and documentation of goals of care.

medicine, general & internal,public, environmental & occupational health,health care sciences & services
Illinois hospital using Web to build database for relationship marketing

T Rees

Abstract:Silver Cross Hospital and Medical Centers, Joliet, Ill., is promoting its Web site as a tool for gathering health information about patients and prospective patients in order to build a relationship marketing database. The database will enable the hospital to identify health care needs of consumers in Joliet, Will County and many southwestern suburbs of Chicago. The Web site is promoted in a multimedia advertising campaign that invites residents to participate in a Healthy Living Quiz that rewards respondents with free health screenings. The effort is part of a growing planning and marketing strategy in the health care industry called customer relationship management (CRM). Not only does a total CRM plan offer health care organizations the chance to discover the potential for meeting consumers' needs; it also helps find any marketplace gaps that may exist.
The role of patient-related factors in the implementation of a multimodal home-based rehabilitation intervention after discharge from inpatient geriatric rehabilitation (GeRas): a qualitative process evaluation

Leonie Maier,Petra Benzinger,Bastian Abel,Patrick Roigk,Martin Bongartz,Isabel Wirth,Ingeborg Cuvelier,Sabine Schölch,Gisela Büchele,Oliver Deuster,Jürgen Bauer,Kilian Rapp,Charlotte Ullrich,Michel Wensing,Catharina Roth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-024-01027-5

2024-07-31

Abstract:Background: Structured aftercare programs are implemented to facilitate the transition from rehabilitation centers to patients' home environments. Taking the program GeRas as an example, this paper aims to evaluate the influence of patient-related factors on the implementation of the geriatric aftercare program GeRas from patients' and providers' perspectives. Methods: To capture patients' and providers' perspectives, qualitative interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide. The analysis was inductive-deductive and based on the thematic analysis by Braun and Clarke and guided by Domain IV of the CFIR. Results: 16 participants (10 patients, 4 providers, 2 family members) were interviewed from May 2023 to November 2023. Patient-related factors were perceived as an important aspect during the implementation of the GeRas program. The results were allocated to the four Constructs of Domain IV of the CFIR (Motivation, Opportunity, Capability, Needs). Especially patients' intrinsic motivation, social environment, and physical capabilities seemed to be crucial for successful implementation. While extrinsic motivation can mitigate missing personal capabilities, it cannot replace the presence of intrinsic motivation and capabilities. The results showed that patient-related factors are interlinked. Discussion/conclusion: The relevance of patient-related factors during the implementation of the GeRas program shows that such programs must consider these factors during intervention planning.
Community Grand Rounds: Re-Engineering Community and Academic Partnerships in Health Education—A Partnership and Programmatic Evaluation

Kevin Heaton,George R. Smith,Kimberly King,Natalie Watson,Jen Brown,Gina Curry,Brandon Johnson,Betty Nichols,Bernetta Pearson,Ernest Sanders,Norma Sanders,Doriane Miller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2014.0033

2014-01-01

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Community participation in population health improvement can assist university researchers in targeting intervention resources more effectively and efficiently, leading to more effective implementation of interventions, because of joint ownership of both process and product. Two academic health centers partnered with community based organizations to develop a bidirectional educational seminar series called "Community Grand Rounds" (CGR), which identified health concerns of Chicago's South Side residents and provided information regarding university and community resources that addressed community health concerns.OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the community consultants' perceptions of the quality and effectiveness of the planning and implementation of the seminars that resulted from the partnership.METHODS: We conducted one-on-one interviews and focus groups with community consultants to assess their perceptions of the partnership using a tailored version of a previously developed individual and focus group interview instrument. Analysis of the interview text was conducted using grounded theory where themes were coded as they emerged.CONCLUSIONS: CGR is an effective mechanism for providing needed community health information in an easily accessible format. Additional work is needed to determine whether this format represents a sustainable community-university partnership.

public, environmental & occupational health
The Key Role of Nurse Researchers in the Evaluation of Nurse Practitioner Models of Practice

Catherine Hungerford,Brenton Prosser,Rachel Davey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1891/1541-6577.29.3.214

2015-01-01

Research and Theory for Nursing Practice

Abstract:The Nurse Practitioner–Aged Care Models of Practice Program involved diverse models of practice comprising multiple stakeholders located in more than 30 locations across Australia, in remote, rural, urban, and metropolitan settings. Funded by the Australian government, the aims of the program included supporting development of effective, economically viable, and sustainable aged care nurse practitioner models of practice; and enabling improvements in access to primary health care for people aged older than 65 years. This article describes the process by which a framework was developed to support the evaluation of this program. A particular challenge for the nurse researchers involved in the evaluation was to ensure the unique values of the nursing profession were upheld alongside economic, biomedical, and empirical imperatives in the diverse processes involved in collecting and interpreting data. The evaluation framework developed provides an important means of enabling research teams who undertake complex evaluations of diverse nursing models of practice to maintain a common goal—to unify the various stakeholders involved, while at the same time upholding what is most important to the profession of nursing. This article highlights how nurses can play an influential role when involved in the multidisciplinary evaluation of new and innovative approaches to practice.

nursing

Evaluating researchers for the project

SRI Gallup describes selection process

Evaluating the Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing a Novel Referral System for Outpatient Geriatric Services: The Geri-Hub Quality Improvement Initiative

Benefits of Structured Engagement with Target Audiences of a Health Website: Study Design for a Multi-Case Study (Preprint)

Overcoming the Challenges Inherent in Conducting Design Research in Mental Health Settings: Lessons from St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton's Pre and Post-Occupancy Evaluation

What value market research?

An academic-marketing collaborative to promote depression care: a tale of two cultures

Evaluating the Strengthening a Palliative Approach in Long Term Care

The Symphony of Consumer Partnering and Clinical Governance: An Organizational Review Using the RE‐AIM Framework

Collaborating toward equity in Pennsylvania: The Age-Friendly Care, PA project

An evidence-based method for assessing the value of a search tool: a pilot study

Implementation of a Standardized Screening Process to Increase Palliative Care Referrals in Primary Care: An Evidence-Based Quality Approach

Evaluating strategies to recruit health researchers to participate in online survey research

Facilitators and barriers to implementing a specialized care unit for persons with cognitive impairment in an acute geriatric hospital: a process evaluation

Implementation of a multimodal home-based rehabilitation intervention after discharge from inpatient geriatric rehabilitation (GeRas): an early qualitative process evaluation

Communication processes in an advance care planning initiative: A socio-ecological perspective for service evaluation

Illinois hospital using Web to build database for relationship marketing

The role of patient-related factors in the implementation of a multimodal home-based rehabilitation intervention after discharge from inpatient geriatric rehabilitation (GeRas): a qualitative process evaluation

Community Grand Rounds: Re-Engineering Community and Academic Partnerships in Health Education—A Partnership and Programmatic Evaluation

The Key Role of Nurse Researchers in the Evaluation of Nurse Practitioner Models of Practice