Sorbent Membrane Dialysis in Uremia1

D. H. Randerson,H. J. Gurland,B. Schmidt,P. C. Farrell,P. W. E. Hone,C. Stokoe,A. Zuber,A. Blogg,A. Fateh-Moghadam,I. Marschner,W. K�pcke
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000406177
2024-05-18
Contributions to Nephrology
Abstract:The inclusion of activated charcoal within hemodialysis membranes offers potentially improved plasma clearance of creatinine and middle molecules. However, the carbon becomes saturated with continued use and beyond 1 h removal of solutes is by dialysis alone. Two independently conducted crossover studies, to assess the efficacy of sorbent membrane dialysis (SMD) in the treatment of uremia, found predialysis urea levels increased by approximately 15%, creatinine by 10-15%, and inorganic phosphate levels by 10-18% on SMD compared to conventional hemodialysis. One study also observed "middle molecule' (peak "b') levels elevated. No differences were observable in the clinical status of patients. The results suggest that the charcoal content of the SMD device is too small to effect any advantages over conventional dialysis.
urology & nephrology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is the evaluation of the effectiveness and advantages of Sorbent Membrane Dialysis (SMD) in the treatment of uremia, particularly whether it is superior to traditional Hemodialysis (HD) in the removal of middle molecular substances. The background of the study is that the symptoms of uremic patients may be related to the accumulation of middle molecular substances (300-2000 Dalton). Therefore, a sorbent membrane dialyzer containing activated carbon was developed in the hope of improving the clearance rate of these substances. Specifically, the paper compares the effects of SMD and traditional HD through two independent crossover studies (the Munich study and the Sydney study), focusing mainly on the following aspects: 1. **Biochemical parameters**: including levels of metabolic products such as urea, creatinine, and inorganic phosphorus. 2. **Clinical parameters**: such as hemoglobin, white blood cell count, and blood pressure. 3. **Clearance rate of middle molecular substances**: particularly the levels of peak "b" middle molecular substances. The study results show that SMD is not significantly superior to traditional HD in some aspects and even performs worse in some indicators, such as increased levels of urea and creatinine. This is mainly because the activated carbon becomes saturated quickly during use, leading to a decrease in clearance efficiency. Therefore, the paper concludes that the existing SMD equipment, due to insufficient activated carbon content, cannot provide significant advantages.