Abstract:In recent years there has been a drive to embed sustainable development into the Higher Education design curriculum. Within the UK this has been encouraged institutionally through the Engineering Council’s UK Standard for Professional Engineering Competence and the Royal Academy of Engineering’s visiting professor scheme. Despite these efforts sustainable development does not appear to have been fully embedded into the design curriculum. Where sustainable development has been introduced it has often been viewed in isolation from the design process, as an add-on, distraction or introduced toward the end of the student’s academic career. Progress is evident with educational approaches involving problem based learning (PBL) and peer assisted learning (PAL) yielding measurable benefits. However, the main focus of activity has been toward the more quantitative aspects of sustainability namely environmental and economic impacts whilst the less tangible qualitative and social factors are ignored. More recently the concept of “social usefulness” has emerged as a means for engaging design engineering students with these aspects of sustainability. To encourage student engagement with the broader elements of sustainable development, particularly in the social sphere, a short course was developed from ongoing research and experience gained from previous programmes. Building upon previous work the compulsory course ran for the first week of the academic year with students involved in no other academic activities. Students were drawn from first and second year cohorts of Design Engineering and placed in small mixed groups with no account taken for prior academic performance. The methodology utilised design analysis as the backbone and each group issued with a different consumer product. Verbal briefs were provided at key stages and although initially limited in detail, the scope and duration expanded as the course progressed. Within this context groups analysed the product from a broad sustainability perspective. This analysis included social usefulness, the functional service provided to the consumer and wider community, the product-service mix and material utilisation. Didactic elements were restricted to short micro-seminars emphasising the underlying concepts with learning delivered through PBL, PAL and student presentations. Learning was reinforced through post presentation discussion sessions and reflective learning accounts which students submitted at pre-defined intervals. Analysis of the presentations and reflective accounts indicated development in the students understanding of sustainability and the relevance to engineering and product design. Students identified the difference between aspirational and inspirational products, how social usefulness can be linked to service and how changes to the product-service mix can improve material utilisation. The use of PBL and PAL encouraged students to develop their own strategies for problem solving and learning better equipping them with the skills required for study within HE and beyond into lifelong learning and continuous professional development. An interesting observation was made in that emotional attachment by the students to the products upon which the activity was based inhibited the students’ ability to consider them objectively. This was unexpected and considered an important learning observation leading the research team to consider adapting the phenomena to both existing and proposed learning programmes.

Experiential Learning for Applying Green Patents in Sustainable Education

Cultivating Intellectual Property Education in the Electronics Engineering Curriculum: A Case Study in Integrated Circuit Design

Project-based learning and pedagogies for virtual reality-aided green building education: case study on a university course

An empirical analysis of green convention attendees' switching intentions

Experiential Learning To Promote Systems Thinking in Chemistry: Evaluating and Designing Sustainable Products in a Polymer Immersion Lab

Does green entrepreneurial behavior enhance through entrepreneurship education, perceived-ability to use technology, and commitment to environment? Understanding the contribution of entrepreneurial motivation and university support

Green building energy: Patents analysis and analytical hierarchy process evaluation

Expedited Patent Examination for Green Inventions: Developing Countries' Policy Choices

The Impact of Startups’ Dual Learning on Their Green Innovation Capability: The Effects of Business Executives’ Environmental Awareness and Environmental Regulations

Learning by sustainable living to improve sustainability literacy

The Influence of Executives' Education Background on Corporate Green Innovation: A Dual Perspective of Risk Bearing and Social Responsibility

Impact of institutional support and green knowledge transfer on university students' absorptive capacity and green entrepreneurial behavior: The moderating role of environmental responsibility

An Empirical Analysis of Green Absorptive Capacity, Green Innovation, and Enterprise Performance: A Green Entrepreneurship Orientation Approach

Influence mechanism of undergraduate students' green innovation behavior: AMO perspective and multilevel empirical study

System Dynamics Based Modeling of Group Green Cooperation Experiment Teaching

Integrating Sustainable Educational Innovations and Spatial Cognition: A Study of Factors Affecting College Students' Sustainable Learning Behavior in Virtual Simulation Environments

Inspiring Sustainability in Undergraduate Engineering Programs

Shaping pro-environmental behaviors through eco-diaries and research-based projects: an experimental study of business students at Yangzhou University

Study of the Training of Environmentalists through Gamification as A University Course

Integrating Social Factors Through Design Analysis

Innovative Practice of Sustainable Landscape Architecture Education—Parametric-Aided Design and Application