Quality of Reporting on Anastomotic Leaks in Colorectal Cancer Trials: A Systematic Review
Danique J I Heuvelings,Omar Mollema,Sander M J van Kuijk,Merel L Kimman,Marylise Boutros,Nader Francis,Nicole D Bouvy,Patricia Sylla,CoReAL Collaborative,Michel Adamina,Alberto Arezzo,Mahdi Al-Taher,Tan Arulampalam,Saba Balvardi,Himani Bhatt,Marta Botti,Stephanie O Breukink,David A Clark,Freek Daams,Jennifer S Davids,Anse De Sadeleer,Abe Fingerhut,Zoe Garoufalia,Anke H C Gielen,Mukesh G Harisinghani,Roel Hompes,Neil H Hyman,Mehraneh D Jafari,John T Jenkins,Audrey C H M Jongen,Deborah S Keller,Samuel H Lai,Jérémie H Lefevre,Bibi Martens,Justin A Maykel,Jeongyoon Moon,Nariaki Okomoto,Ian Paquette,Gianluca Pellino,Sherief F Shawki,Benjamin D Shogan,Chelliah Selvasekar,Simon Siu-Man Ng,Jasper Stijns,Patricia Tejedor,William Tzu-Liang Chen,Yu-Ting T van Loon,Christiaan van Der Leij,Steven D Wexner,Elizabeth Wick,Marina Yiasemidou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003475
2024-11-01
Abstract:Background: Although attempts have been made in the past to establish consensus regarding the definitions and grading of the severity of colorectal anastomotic leakage, widespread adoption has remained limited. Objective: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to examine the various elements used to report and define anastomotic leakage in colorectal cancer resections. Data sources: A systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Database. Study selection: All published randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses containing data related to adult patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery and reporting anastomotic leakage as a primary or secondary outcome, with a definition of anastomotic leakage were included. Main outcome measures: Definitions of anastomotic leakage, clinical symptoms, radiological modalities and findings, findings at reoperation, and grading terminology or classifications for anastomotic leakage. Results: Of the 471 articles reporting anastomotic leakage as a primary or secondary outcome, a definition was reported in 95 studies (45 randomized controlled trials, 13 systematic reviews, and 37 meta-analyses) involving a total of 346,140 patients. Of these 95 articles, 68% reported clinical signs and symptoms of anastomotic leakage, 26% biochemical criteria, 63% radiological modalities, 62% radiological findings, and 13% findings at reintervention. Only 45% (n = 43) of included studies reported grading of anastomotic leakage severity or leak classification, and 41% (n = 39) included a time frame for reporting. Limitations: There was a high level of heterogeneity between the included studies. Conclusions: This evidence synthesis confirmed incomplete and inconsistent reporting of anastomotic leakage across the published colorectal cancer literature. There is a great need to develop and implement a consensus framework for defining, grading, and reporting anastomotic leakage. Registration: Prospectively registered at PROSPERO (ID 454660).