Abstract:Over the last year, the ascent of Generative AI (GenAI) has raised concerns about its impact on core skill development, such as problem-solving and algorithmic thinking, in Computer Science students. Preliminary anonymous surveys show that at least 48.5% of our students use GenAI for homework. With the proliferation of these tools, the academic community must contemplate the appropriate role of these tools in education. Neglecting this might culminate in a phenomenon we term the "Junior-Year Wall," where students struggle in advanced courses due to prior over-dependence on GenAI. Instead of discouraging GenAI use, which may unintentionally foster covert usage, our research seeks to answer: "How can educators guide students' interactions with GenAI to preserve core skill development during their foundational academic years?" We introduce "AI-Lab," a pedagogical framework for guiding students in effectively leveraging GenAI within core collegiate programming courses. This framework accentuates GenAI's benefits and potential as a pedagogical instrument. By identifying and rectifying GenAI's errors, students enrich their learning process. Moreover, AI-Lab presents opportunities to use GenAI for tailored support such as topic introductions, detailed examples, corner case identification, rephrased explanations, and debugging assistance. Importantly, the framework highlights the risks of GenAI over-dependence, aiming to intrinsically motivate students towards balanced usage. This approach is premised on the idea that mere warnings of GenAI's potential failures may be misconstrued as instructional shortcomings rather than genuine tool limitations. Additionally, AI-Lab offers strategies for formulating prompts to elicit high-quality GenAI responses. For educators, AI-Lab provides mechanisms to explore students' perceptions of GenAI's role in their learning experience.

Using Generative AI to Promote the APA's Five Goals for Undergraduate Majors

Using Generative AI to Promote Psychological, Feedback, and Artificial Intelligence Literacies in Undergraduate Psychology

Generative AI and College Students: Use and Perceptions

Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Exploring Ways of Harnessing Pedagogical Practices with the Assistance of ChatGPT

The Evolution of Learning: Assessing the Transformative Impact of Generative AI on Higher Education

Generative AI in Higher Education: Seeing ChatGPT Through Universities' Policies, Resources, and Guidelines

Using Generative Artificial Intelligence Creatively in the Classroom: Examples and Lessons Learned

Innovating Computer Programming Pedagogy: The AI-Lab Framework for Generative AI Adoption

Early Perceptions of Teaching and Learning Using Generative AI in Higher Education

ChatGPT and Generative Artificial Intelligence for Medical Education: Potential Impact and Opportunity

Generative AI and Marketing Education: What the Future Holds

Generative Artificial Intelligence: Implications and Considerations for Higher Education Practice

Generative AI: hopes, controversies and the future of faculty roles in education

Generative AI in Computing Education: Perspectives of Students and Instructors

Generative AI in the Classroom: Can Students Remain Active Learners?

Student and Faculty Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Student Writing

Skilling for the Future: Enhancing Vocational Learning and Workplace Productivity with Creative AI Tools

AI as Fad or AI as Lasting? Priorities for College Faculty Instructional Development for Generative Artificial Intelligence

Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Evidence from an Analysis of Institutional Policies and Guidelines

ChatGPT in Classrooms: Transforming Challenges into Opportunities in Education