Abstract:During the "Third Reich," the majority of German gynecologists and obstetricians did not hesitate to put themselves at the service of those in power. In 1933, many gynecologists initially only focused on the fact that the biopolitical objectives of the National Socialists matched their own long-standing demands for population policy measures and the early detection and prevention of cancer. In addition, cooperating with the Nazis promised the political advancement of the profession, personal advantages, and the honorary title of Volksgesundheitsführer (national health leaders). As a result, gynecologists exchanged resources with the regime and thus contributed significantly to the implementation of the criminal racial policies of the Nazis. At the congresses of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie (German Society of Gynecology) "non-Aryan" members, mostly of Jewish descent, were excluded, the law on forced sterilization of 1933 (Gesetz zur Verhütung erbkranken Nachwuchses/Law for the Prevention of Offspring with Hereditary Diseases) was scientifically legitimized, its implementation was propagated, and relevant surgical techniques were discussed with regard to their "certainty of success." In the course of these forced sterilizations, existing pregnancies were also terminated and the victims were misused for illegal scientific examinations or experiments. Drawing upon racial and utilitarian considerations, gynecologists did not even shy away from carrying out late abortions on forced laborers from the East during the Second World War, which were strictly prohibited even under the laws of the time. Some gynecologists carried out cruel experiments on humans in concentration camps, which primarily served their own careers and the biopolitical goals of those in power. The few times gynecologists did protest or resist was when the very interests of their profession seemed threatened, as in the dispute over home births and the rights of midwives. Social gynecological initiatives from the Weimar Republic, which were mainly supported and carried out by gynecologists persecuted for their Jewish descent since 1933, were either converted into National Socialist "education programs" or simply came to an end due to the exclusion of their initiators. German gynecologists had hoped for a large-scale promotion of the early detection of malignant diseases of the uterus and breasts, to which they had already made important contributions since the beginning of the 20th century. But even though the fight against cancer was allegedly one of the priorities of the Nazis, no comprehensive measures were taken. Still, a few locally limited initiatives to this end proved to be successful until well into the Second World War. In addition, German gynecologists established the modern concept of prenatal care and continued to advance endocrinological research and sterility therapy. After the end of the Nazi dictatorship, the historical guilt piled up during this period was suppressed and denied for decades. Its revision and processing only began in the 1990s.

[100 years of the Wertheim operation--Ernst Wertheim between myth and reality]

On the Shoulders of Giants Through the Lens of the Laparoscope Dr. Harry Reich: Empathy, Optics and Courage

"A Revolution in Favor of Reproduction"? Gynecology and Obstetrics in the "Third Reich"

The case of Robert Herrlinger: a unique postwar controversy on the ethics of the anatomical use of bodies of the executed during National Socialism

From Satirical Poems and Invisible Poisons to Radical Surgery and Organized Cervical Cancer Screening—A Historical Outline of Cervical Carcinoma and Its Relation to HPV Infection

150 years ago: Schwartze's 1873 mastoidectomy and its implementation over the following 2 years

Treatment of endometrial cancer from 2000 to 2020 in Germany: a retrospective population based cohort study

Evolution of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer along the last two decades: single institution experience

Welcome to the Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery

Anatomist Hermann Stieve used Nazi victims for his research on the menstrual cycle, but did he also fabricate facts?

Electrosurgery and Other Technical Advancements in Minimally Invasive Gynecological Surgery - An Update

[IS IT APPROPRIATE TO CHANGE THE NAMES OF SURGICAL PROCEDURES AND EXAMINATIONS IN THE FIELD OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY WHICH GIVE EPONYMS DISTINCTION TO NAZI DOCTORS?]

Hysteroscopy: where did we start, and where are we now? The compelling story of what many considered the "Cinderella" of gynecological endoscopy

McCarus Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: 20 Years' Experience-Lessons Learned

Access to Hysterectomy—What Is the Realistic Rate for Pure Vaginal Hysterectomy? A Single-Center Prospective Observational Study

Medieval orthopaedic history in Germany: Hieronymus Brunschwig and Hans von Gersdorff

Alban Köhler – Ein Rückblick zu seinem 150. Geburtstag anhand seiner "Lebenserinnerungen" und seiner Röntgenbücher

Range of Resection in Endometrial Cancer—Clinical Issues of Made-to-Measure Surgery

Role of laparoscopic hysterectomy in cervical and endometrial cancer: a narrative review

From Catheters To Ventricular Assist Devices: 60 Years of Cardiovascular Experiences With William L. Winters, JR., M.D.

[Surgical dogmas throughout history]