Abstract:Objectives: Current information on the safety of rear row occupants of all ages is needed to inform further advances in rear seat restraint system design and testing. The objectives of this study were to describe characteristics of occupants in the front and rear rows of model year 2000 and newer vehicles involved in crashes and determine the risk of serious injury for restrained crash-involved rear row occupants and the relative risk of fatal injury for restrained rear row vs. front passenger seat occupants by age group, impact direction, and vehicle model year. Method: Data from the National Automotive Sampling System Crashworthiness Data System (NASS-CDS) and Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) were queried for all crashes during 2007-2012 involving model year 2000 and newer passenger vehicles. Data from NASS-CDS were used to describe characteristics of occupants in the front and rear rows and to determine the risk of serious injury (AIS 3+) for restrained rear row occupants by occupant age, vehicle model year, and impact direction. Using a combined data set containing data on fatalities from FARS and estimates of the total population of occupants in crashes from NASS-CDS, logistic regression modeling was used to compute the relative risk (RR) of death for restrained occupants in the rear vs. front passenger seat by occupant age, impact direction, and vehicle model year. Results: Among all vehicle occupants in tow-away crashes during 2007-2012, 12.3% were in the rear row where the overall risk of serious injury was 1.3%. Among restrained rear row occupants, the risk of serious injury varied by occupant age, with older adults at the highest risk of serious injury (2.9%); by impact direction, with rollover crashes associated with the highest risk (1.5%); and by vehicle model year, with model year 2007 and newer vehicles having the lowest risk of serious injury (0.3%). Relative risk of death was lower for restrained children up to age 8 in the rear compared with passengers in the right front seat (RR=0.27, 95% CI 0.12-0.58 for 0-3 years, RR=0.55, 95% CI 0.30-0.98 for 4-8 years) but was higher for restrained 9-12-year-old children (RR=1.83, 95% CI 1.18-2.84). There was no evidence for a difference in risk of death in the rear vs. front seat for occupants ages 13-54, but there was some evidence for an increased relative risk of death for adults age 55 and older in the rear vs. passengers in the right front seat (RR=1.41, 95% CI 0.94-2.13), though we could not exclude the possibility of no difference. After controlling for occupant age and gender, the relative risk of death for restrained rear row occupants was significantly higher than that of front seat occupants in model year 2007 and newer vehicles and significantly higher in rear and right side impact crashes. Conclusions: Results of this study extend prior research on the relative safety of the rear seat compared with the front by examining a more contemporary fleet of vehicles. The rear row is primarily occupied by children and adolescents, but the variable relative risk of death in the rear compared with the front seat for occupants of different age groups highlights the challenges in providing optimal protection to a wide range of rear seat occupants. Findings of an elevated risk of death for rear row occupants, as compared with front row passengers, in the newest model year vehicles provides further evidence that rear seat safety is not keeping pace with advances in the front seat.

Frontal NCAP crash tests with rear-seat occupant

Frontal NCAP performance and field injury over 40 years

Effect of load limiting the shoulder-belt on right-front passenger kinematics in oblique-offset and NCAP frontal crash tests

Safety priorities for occupant protection in rear impacts

An evaluation of front seat distance from rear facing child restraint systems in prevention of injury in frontal crash tests

Safety Performance Comparisons of Different Types of Child Seats in High Speed Impact Tests

An Experimental Study of the Effects of Child Restraint Improper Installation and Crash Protection for Larger Size Children

Interactions between rearward-facing child restraint systems and the center console in frontal impact sled tests

Effectiveness of Booster Seats Compared with No Restraint or Seat Belt Alone for Crash Injury Prevention

Rear seat safety: Variation in protection by occupant, crash and vehicle characteristics

Driver and front passenger injury in frontal crashes: Update on the effect of unbelted rear occupants

Effects of LATCH versus Available Seatbelt Installation of Rear Facing Child Restraint Systems on Head Injury Criteria for 6 Month Old Infants in Rear End Collisions

Responses of the scaled pediatric human body model in the rear- and forward-facing child seats in simulated frontal motor vehicle crashes

Dynamic frontal crash performance of old and used child restraint systems

Study on the influence of seating orientation during frontal impacts by child occupant human body model response analysis

Adapting load limiter deployment for frontal crash diversity

Numerical Low-Back Booster Analysis on a 6-Year-Old Infant during a Frontal Crash Test

Pediatric occupant human body model kinematic and kinetic response variation to changes in seating posture in simulated frontal impacts – with and without automatic emergency braking

Influence of Vehicle Model Year and Occupant Seating Position on Serious Injury Risk in Near-Side Collision

Using Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System (CODES) to examine injury in front vs. rear-seated infants and children involved in a motor vehicle crash in New York State

Numerical Low-Back Booster Analysis in a 6-Year-Old Infant during a Dolly Rollover Test